TQ DELTA, LLC v. ZYXEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

Civil Action Nos. 1:13-cv-02013-RGA, 1:14-cv-00954-RGA, 1:15-cv-00121-RGA

TQ DELTA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ZYXEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and ZYXEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Defendants. TQ DELTA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ADTRAN, INC., Defendants. ADTRAN, INC., Plaintiff, v. TQ DELTA, LLC, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

June 27, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Adtran Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Kenneth Laurence Dorsney , Morris James LLP & Mary Matterer , Morris James LLP.

TQ Delta LLC, Defendant, represented by Brian E. Farnan , Farnan LLP, Andrew B. Karp , McAndrews, Held and Malloy, Ltd., pro hac vice, Anna M. Targowska , McAndrews, Held and Malloy, Ltd., pro hac vice, Ari B. Lukoff , Robins Kaplan LLP, pro hac vice, David A. Prange , Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P., pro hac vice, Kris Y. Teng , Robins Kaplan LLP, pro hac vice, Michael S. Tomsa , McAndrews, Held and Malloy, Ltd., pro hac vice, Paul W. McAndrews , McAndrews, Held and Malloy, Ltd., pro hac vice, Peter J. McAndrews , McAndrews, Held and Malloy, Ltd., pro hac vice, Rajendra A. Chiplunkar , McAndrews Held & Malloy, Ltd., pro hac vice, Sharon A. Hwang , McAndrews Held & Malloy, Ltd., pro hac vice, Sharon E. Roberg-Perez , Robins Kaplan LLP, pro hac vice, Thomas J. Wimbiscus , McAndrews Held & Malloy, Ltd., pro hac vice & Timothy J. Malloy , McAndrews Held & Malloy, Ltd., pro hac vice.

Broadcom Corporation, Intervenor, represented by Jeffrey L. Moyer , Richards, Layton & Finger, PA & Christine Dealy Haynes , Richards, Layton & Finger, PA.

TQ Delta LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Brian E. Farnan , Farnan LLP.

Adtran Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Kenneth Laurence Dorsney , Morris James LLP.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Presently before the Court is the issue of claim construction of multiple terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,445,730 ("the '730 patent"); 7,978,753 ("the '753 patent"); 8,437,382 ("the '382 patent"); and 8,611,404 ("the '404 patent"). The Court has considered the Parties' Joint Claim Construction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases