PURDUE PHARMA L.P., PURDUE PHARMACEUTICALS L.P., THE P.F. LABORATORIES, INC., and RHODES TECHNOLOGIES, Plaintiffs,
v.
AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, Defendant.
United States District Court, D. Delaware.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
The P.F. Laboratories, Inc. & Rhodes Technologies, Plaintiffs, represented by Jack B. Blumenfeld , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP & Rodger Dallery Smith, II , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP.
Kashiv Pharma, LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Samantha G. Wilson , Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP & Anne Shea Gaza , Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP.
Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P., Purdue Pharma L.P., Rhodes Technologies & The P.F. Laboratories, Inc., Counter Defendants, represented by Jack B. Blumenfeld , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP & Rodger Dallery Smith, II , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP.
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Anne Shea Gaza , Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP.
RICHARD G. ANDREWS, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the issue of claim construction of multiple terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 9,492,392 ("the '392 patent"), 9,492,393 ("the '393 patent"), and 9,522,919 ("the '919 patent"). The Court has considered the parties' joint claim construction brief. (D.I. 48). The Court heard oral argument on...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.