GONZALES v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Case No. 17-cv-02264-JSC.

305 F.Supp.3d 1078 (2018)

Michael GONZALES, Plaintiff, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Signed April 18, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Caleb Marker , Zimmerman Reed LLP, Manhattan Beach, CA, Hannah Parke Belknap , Palmer Lombardi & Donohue LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Ling Yue Kuang , Mark Etheredge Burton, Jr. , Mark Etheredge Burton, Jr. , Michael Andrew McShane , Audet & Partners, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff.

Patrick Leo Oot, Jr. , Shook, Hardy and Bacon, LLP, Washington, DC, Elizabeth Anne Lee , John K. Sherk, III , Michael Kevin Underhill , Shook, Hardy Bacon L.L.P., San Francisco, CA, for Defendants.


ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Michael Gonzales brings this action on his own behalf and as a putative class action for Lyft drivers whose electronic communications and whereabouts were allegedly intercepted, accessed, monitored, and/or transmitted by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases