1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 310 F.Supp.3d
  5. 310 F.Supp.3d 662 (2018)
 

ACOSTA v. VINOSKEY

Case No. 6:16-CV-00062.

310 F.Supp.3d 662 (2018)

R. Alexander ACOSTA, Plaintiff, v. Adam VINOSKEY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Lynchburg Division.

Signed April 17, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Nature of Suit: 791 Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrea Christensen Luby , United States Department of Labor Office of the Regional Solicitor, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff.

Alton Larue Gwaltney, III , Kristen J. Kenley , Pro Hac Vice, Moore & Van Allen PLLC, Charlotte, NC, Chelsea Royce Mikula Tomko , Pro Hac Vice, Paul Lewis Janowicz , Pro Hac Vice, Tucker Ellis, LLP, Cleveland, OH, Scott J. Stitt , Pro Hac Vice, Tucker Ellis LLP, Columbus, OH, Alexandra E. Brisky Cunningham , Thomas Richard Waskom , Brian Adam Wright , Hunton & Williams LLP, Richmond, VA, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Congress enacted the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, or ERISA, to protect employees and the benefit plans employers create for them. Congress did this by imposing high standards of fiduciary duty on plan...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases