1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. NAVA v. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
 

NAVA v. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY

Case No. 2:17-cv-00296-MCE-DB.

MARIO A. NAVA, Plaintiff, v. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, ET AL., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California-Sacramento Division.

April 3, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A. - Employee Benefits
Nature of Suit: 791 Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mario A. Nava, Plaintiff, represented by Joseph S. McMillen , Mckennon Law Group PC.

Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Defendant, represented by Ryan Nicholas Dunlevy , Hardy Erich Brown & Wilson, Stacey A. Campbell , Campbell Litigation, P.C., pro hac vice & Stephen W. Robertson , Hardy Erich Brown & Wilson.

Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Defendant, represented by Ryan Nicholas Dunlevy , Hardy Erich Brown & Wilson & Stephen W. Robertson , Hardy Erich Brown & Wilson.

ORDER ON STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT, WITH PREJUDICE

In accordance with the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing, this action Is hereby dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, each side to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases