ACLU v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT

Civil Action No. 17-cv-01598 (TSC).

303 F.Supp.3d 11 (2018)

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, Femhealth USA, Inc., d/b/a Carafem, Milo Worldwide LLC, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Paul J. Wiedefeld, Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

Signed March 31, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur B. Spitzer , Scott Michelman , American Civil Liberties Union of the District of Columbia, Washington, DC, Brian Matthew Hauss , Pro Hac Vice, Lee Rowland , Pro Hac Vice, New York, NY, Leslie C. Mehta , Pro Hac Vice, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for Plaintiffs.

James Edward Tysse , Pratik Shah , Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, DC, Jessica M. Weisel , Pro Hac Vice, Rex S. Heinke , Pro Hac Vice, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority ("WMATA") prohibits certain kinds of advertisements in the metro system. Plaintiffs American Civil Liberties Union ("ACLU"), Femhealth USA, Inc., d/b/a Carafem ("Carafem"), MILO Worldwide LLC...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases