BREEN v. CHAO

Civil Action No. 05-0654 (PLF).

304 F.Supp.3d 9 (2018)

Kathleen BREEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Elaine L. CHAO, Secretary of Transportation, Department of Transportation, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

Signed March 27, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Nature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian Christopher Corman , Shaylyn Capri Cochran , Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Meghan Alexis Droste , Wilkenfeld, Herendeen & Atkinson, Washington, DC, Lenore Cooper Garon , Law Office of Lenore C. Garon, PLLC, Falls Church, VA, Michal Shinnar , Law Offices of Gary M. Gilbert & Associates, P.C., Stephanie Marie Herrera , Linda Anton Kincaid , Gilbert Employment Law, P.C., Silver Spring, MD, for Plaintiffs.

Donna Dodson, Amherst, OH, pro se.

Steven Tangen, Landsdowne, VA, pro se.

Eldon D. Taylor, Jr., Renton, WA, pro se.

Jeffrey G. Trabold, Kalkaska, MI, pro se.

Robert Pedraza, El Paso, TX, pro se.

Sharon H. Lange, Oxford, AL, pro se.

John Lazor, Miami, FL, pro se.

William Liebeno, North Richland Hills, TX, pro se.

Fred E. Lippi, San Carlos, CA, pro se.

Barbara McInerney, St. Louis, MO, pro se.

Rebecca S. Nedderman, Valley Park, MO, pro se.

Julia M. Greenway, Burke, VA, pro se.

Martha L. Grimsley, DeRidder, LA, pro se.

Ralph E. Kerschner, Jr., Oxford, AL, pro se.

Norman B. Buckallew, Florien, LA, pro se.

Roy M. Carroll, Riverside, AL, pro se.

Kenneth C. Currier, Miami, FL, pro se.

G. Peter Berggren, Dewey, AZ, pro se.

Angela B. Bowman, Choccolocco, AL, pro se.

Kevin C. Hoyt, Chino Valley, AZ, pro se.

Tom Domingo, Elkins, WV, pro se.

Frank Matkins, Saginaw, TX, pro se.

Janice I. Wilson, Dewey, AZ, pro se.

Jim G. Wilkerson, Fairbanks, AK, pro se.

Charles E. Holland, Ashburn, VA, pro se.

William R. Madden, Mahomet, IL, pro se.

Henry Ontiveros, Roanoke, TX, pro se.

Adam D. Kirschner , Brian G. Kennedy , Elizabeth L. Kade , Lisa Zeidner Marcus , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendants.


OPINION

This matter comes before the Court on the motion [Dkt. No. 317] of dismissed plaintiffs for reconsideration of the Court's orders of dismissal. For the following reasons, the Court will grant the dismissed plaintiffs' motion and reinstate their claims.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases