1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 302 F.Supp.3d
  5. 302 F.Supp.3d 640 (2018)
 

3G LICENSING, S.A. v. BLACKBERRY LTD.

C.A. No. 17-82-LPS-CJB, C.A. No. 17-84-LPS-CJB, C.A. No. 17-85-LPS-CJB, C.A. No. 17-86-LPS-CJB, C.A. No. 17-90-LPS-CJB, C.A. No. 17-91-LPS-CJB, C.A. No. 17-92-LPS-CJB.

302 F.Supp.3d 640 (2018)

3G LICENSING, S.A., Koninklijke KPN N.V., and Orange S.A., Plaintiffs, v. BLACKBERRY LIMITED and Blackberry Corporation, Defendants. 3G Licensing, S.A., Koninklijke KPN N.V., and Orange S.A., Plaintiffs, v. Lenovo Group Ltd., Lenovo Holding Co., Inc., Lenovo (United States) Inc. and Motorola Mobility LLC, Defendants. 3G Licensing, S.A., Koninklijke KPN N.V., and Orange S.A., Plaintiffs, v. LG Electronics Inc., LG Electronics, U.S.A., Inc. and LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc., Defendants. Koninklijke KPN N.V., Plaintiffs, v. Gemalto IOT LLC, Gemalto M2M GMBH, and Gemalto Inc., Defendants. Koninklijke KPN N.V., Plaintiffs, v. Sierra Wireless, Inc. and Sierra Wireless America, Inc., Defendant. Koninklijke KPN N.V., Plaintiff, v. TCL Communication, Inc., TCL Communication Technology Holding Limited, TCT Mobile, Inc., TCT Mobile (US) Inc., and TCT Mobile (US) Holdings, Inc., Defendants. Koninklijke KPN N.V., Plaintiff, v. Telit Wireless Solutions, Inc., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

Signed March 22, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. , Brian E. Farnan , Michael J. Farnan , FARNAN LLP, Wilmington, DE, Alexandra G. White , Jeffrey S. David , Hunter Vance , Rocco Magni , SUSMAN & GODFREY, Houston, TX, Andres C. Healy , SUSMAN & GODFREY, Seattle, WA, Attorneys for Plaintiffs. 3G Licensing, S.A., Koninklijke KPN N.V., and Orange S.A.

Colm F. Connolly , MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, Wilmington, DE, Amy M. Dudash , Eric Kraeutler , John V. Gorman , MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Robert C. Bertin , MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, Washington, DC, Attorneys for Defendants Blackberry Limited and Blackberry Corporation.

Jack B. Blumenfeld , MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP, Wilmington, DE, Jonathan E. Retsy , Kathleen B. Barry , James Winn , WINSTON & STRAWN LLP, Chicago, IL, Andrew R. Sommer , WINSTON & STRAWN LLP, Washington, . DC, Attorneys for Defendants Lenovo Holding Co. Inc., and Lenovo (United States) Inc.

Roger D. Smith, II , MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP, Wilmington, DE, Peter H. Kang , Ashish Nagdev , Jingyung Lee , SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Ryan M. Sandrock , SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendants LG Electronics Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc.,

David E. Moore , Bindu A. Palapura , Stephanie E. O'Byrne , POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON, LLP, Wilmington, DE, Brian A. Rosenthal , GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER, New York, NY, Colby A. Davis , GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER, Los Angeles, CA, Brian K. Andrea , GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER, Washington, DC, Attorneys for Defendants Gemalto IOT LLC, Gemalto M2M GMBH and Gemalto Inc.

Jack B. Blumenfeld , MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP, Wilmington, DE, Adam Alper , Eric Cheng , Sarah L. Forney , KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, San Francisco, CA, Michael W. De Vries , KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Attorneys for Defendants Sierra Wireless America, Inc., and Sierra Wireless, Inc.

Jody Barillare , MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, Wilmington, DE, William P. Quinn, Jr. , MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Bradford A. Cangro , Hang Zheng , MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, Washington, DC, Attorneys for Defendants TCL Communication Technology Holding Ltd., TCL Communication, Inc., TCL Mobile, Inc., TCT Mobile (US) Inc., and TCT Mobile (US) Holdings, Inc.

Jack B. Blumenfeld , MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP, Wilmington, DE, David A. Loewenstein , Guy Yonay , Clyde A. Shuman , PEARL COHEN ZEDEK LATZER BARATZ LLP, New York, NY, Attorneys for Defendant Telit Wireless Solutions, Inc.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff Koninklijke KPN N.V. ("KPN") sued multiple defendants in numerous related actions for alleged infringement of KPN's U.S. Patent No. 6,212,662 ("'662 patent"). Pending before the Court is Defendants' motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases