1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MICHIGAN v. JOHNSON
 

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MICHIGAN v. JOHNSON

No. 2:17-cv-14148.

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MICHIGAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. RUTH JOHNSON, in her official capacity as Michigan Secretary of State, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

March 14, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 441 Civil Rights: Voting
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

League of Women Voters of Michigan, Roger J. Brdak, Frederick C. Durhal, Jr., Jack E. Ellis, Donna E. Farris, William "Bill" J. Grasha, Rosa L. Holliday, Diana L. Ketola, Jon "Jack" G. LaSalle, Richard "Dick" W. Long, Lorenzo Rivera & Rashida H. Tlaib, Plaintiffs, represented by Harmony Mappes , Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Jeffrey P. Justman , Faegre Baker Daniels, Mark C. Brewer , Goodman Acker & Joseph H. Yeager , Faegre Baker Daniels LLP.

Ruth Johnson, Defendant, represented by Peter H. Ellsworth , Dickinson Wright, Robert P. Young, Jr. , Dickinson Wright & Ryan M. Shannon , Dickinson Wright, PLLC.

Republican Congressional Delegation, Defendant, represented by Brian Shekell , Clark Hill PLC.

William F. Carney, Jeff Cobb, Shelly Edgerton, Frederick Hall, David Hildenbrand, Joseph Hune, Rick Jones, Scott Jones, James Kinsey, Marty Knollenberg, James Marleau, Terry Marquardt, John Proos, Randy Richardville, Brian Began, Jase Bolger, Ralph Fiebig, J. Lohrstorfer, Pete Lund, Edward McBroom, Daniel McMaster, Rick Outman, Al Pscholka, Gary Randall & Sharon Tyler, Movants, represented by Gary P. Gordon , Dykema Gossett, Jason T. Hanselman , Dykema Gossett, PLLC & Kyle M. Asher , Dykema Gossett PLLC.

Robert LaBrant & Michigan Chamber of Commerce, Interested Partys, represented by Gary P. Gordon , Dykema Gossett.

Robert I. Schostak, Interested Party, represented by Eric E. Doster , Doster Law Offices, PLLC.

ORDER

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING RESOLUTION OF WHITFORD AND BENISEK

Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Stay and to Dismiss for Lack of Standing. [Dkt. No. 11.] This Order addresses only Defendant's request for a stay; Defendant's arguments for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases