LYZER v. CARUSO PRODUCE, INC.

Case No. 3:17-cv-1335-SB.

MICHAEL LYZER, Plaintiff, v. CARUSO PRODUCE, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Oregon.

February 20, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 2000e
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights: Employment
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Lyzer, Plaintiff, represented by Carl Lee Post , Law Offices of Daniel Snyder, Daniel J. Snyder , Law Offices of Daniel Snyder & John D. Burgess , Law Offices of Daniel Snyder.

Caruso Produce, Inc., Defendant, represented by Michael A. Cox , Law Office of Michael A. Cox & Paul L. Breed , Paul L. Breed, PC.


ORDER

United States Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman issued Findings and Recommendation in this case on January 29, 2018. ECF 19. Judge Beckerman recommended that Defendant's motion to dismiss be denied. No party has filed objections.

Under the Federal Magistrates Act ("Act"), the court may...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases