1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. NEVRO CORP. v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
 

NEVRO CORP. v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

Case No. 16-cv-06830-VC (MEJ).

NEVRO CORP, Plaintiff, v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

January 24, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nevro Corp, Plaintiff, represented by Michael A. Jacobs , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Alessa Yin-Chen Hwang , Morrison Foerster, Arturo J. Gonzalez , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Bita Rahebi , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Ching-Lee Fukuda , Sidley Austin LLP, Daniel Clayton Hubin , Morrison and Foerster LLP, Elizabeth Ann Patterson , Morrison and Foerster LLP, Eric Chingyun Pai , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Gregory A. Chopskie , Morrison Foerster LLP, Jennifer J. Schmidt , Morrison & Foerster LLP, John Robert Lanham , Morrison Foerster LLP, Kenneth Alexander Kuwayti , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Nicholas Rylan Fung , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Nicholas Ethan Ham , Morrison Foerster LLP, Sabrina Larson , Morrison and Foerster, LLP, Sona De , Sidley Austin LLP & Todd M. Simpson , SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP.

Boston Scientific Corporation & Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Defendants, represented by Matthew M. Wolf , Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, pro hac vice, Amy L. DeWitt , Arnold and Porter Kaye Scholer, Christopher Moulder , Arnold and Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Clara Wing-kwan Wang , Arnold and Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Edmond Kwasi Amoako Ahadome , Arnold and Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, pro hac vice, Edward Han , Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, pro hac vice, Krista Marie Carter , Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Marc A. Cohn , Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Michael Kientzle , Arnold and Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Michael Duy Khiem Nguyen , Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Patrick Conor Reidy , Arnold Porter LLP, Thomas T. Carmack , Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP & William Zachary Louden , Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP.

DISCOVERY ORDER

Re: Dkt. Nos. 222, 235, 267

INTRODUCTION

Pending before the Court are the parties two joint discovery letters. Dkt. Nos. 222, 235; see also Dkt. No. 267 (joint letter following meet and confer). Having considered the parties' positions, the relevant legal authority...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases