1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ADT, LLC v. ALDER HOLDINGS, LLC
 

ADT, LLC v. ALDER HOLDINGS, LLC

Nos. 9:17-CV-81237-ROSENBERG/HOPKINS, 9:15-CV-80073-ROSENBERG/HOPKINS

ADT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ALDER HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Florida.

January 10, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Nature of Suit: 840 Trademark
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ADT LLC & ADT US Holdings, Inc., Plaintiffs, represented by Charles C. Eblen , Shook, Hardy & Bacn, LLP, pro hac vice, Daniel E. Rohner , Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, pro hac vice, Eric J. Hobbs , Shook, Hardy & Bacon, pro hac vice, Kali R. Backer , Shook Hardy & Bacon, LLP, pro hac vice, Richard G. Sander , Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP, pro hac vice, S. Kirk Ingebretsen , Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, pro hac vice & Charles Sanders McNew , McNEW P.A.

Alarm Protection LLC, Alarm Protection Technology Holdings, LLC, Alarm Protection Management LLC, Alarm Protection Alabama LLC, Alarm Protection California LLC, Alarm Protection Florida LLC, Alarm Protection Georgia LLC, Alarm Protection Mississippi LLC, Alarm Protection Tennessee LLC, Alarm Protection Texas LLC, Adam D. Schanz & Alder Holdings, LLC, Defendants, represented by J. Ryan Mitchell , Mitchell Barlow & Mansfield PC, pro hac vice, Michael Walter Marcil , Gunster Yoakley & Stewart PA, Aaron Jay Horowitz , Gunster Yoakley & Stewart PA, Heather Carney Costanzo , Gunster & Jennifer Nicole , Gunster Yoakley & Stewart PA.

Alarm Protection Alaska, LLC, Alarm Protection Arkansas, LLC, Alarm Protection Kentucky, LLC, Alarm Protection Ohio, LLC, Alarm Protection Oklahoma, LLC, Alarm Protection South Carolina, LLC, Alarm Protection Technology, LLC, Rhodesian Protection, LLC & Boerboal Protection, LLC, Defendants, represented by Michael Walter Marcil , Gunster Yoakley & Stewart PA, Aaron Jay Horowitz , Gunster Yoakley & Stewart PA, Heather Carney Costanzo , Gunster & Jennifer Nicole , Gunster Yoakley & Stewart PA.

ORDER STAYING CASE 17-CV-81237, ORDER DISMISSING CASE 15-CV-80073, AND ORDER ON INJUNCTION

This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss at docket entry 18 in case 17-CV-81237 ("ADT III") and Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss at docket entry 432 in case 15-CV-80073...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases