1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ESHELMAN v. PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.
 

ESHELMAN v. PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.

No. 7:16-CV-18-D.

FREDRIC N. ESHELMAN, Plaintiff, v. PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Southern Division.

January 2, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Libel,Assault,Slander
Nature of Suit: 320 Assault Libel & Slander
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pharmaceutical Product Development, LLC, Movant, represented by John H. Anderson, Jr. , McGuireWoods LLP.

Adage Capital Management L.P., Movant, represented by Mark A. Nebrig , Moore & Van Allen PLLC.

Fredric N. Eshelman, Plaintiff, represented by Thomas A. Clare , Clare Locke LLP, Daniel P. Watkins , Clare Locke LLP, Dustin A. Pusch , Clare Locke LLP, Elizabeth M. Locke , Clare Locke LLP, Joseph Ronald Oliveri , Clare Locke LLP, Megan L. Meier , Clare Locke LLP & Andrew Kent McVey , Murchison, Taylor & Gibson, PLLC.

Puma Biotechnology, Inc., Defendant, represented by Brant W. Bishop , Wilkinson Walsh & Eskovitz, Pressly M. Millen , Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP, Aurash Jamali , Wilkinson Walsh + Eskovitz LLP, Enbar Toledano , Wilkinson Walsh & Eskovitz, Hayter L. Whitman , Wilkinson Walsh & Eskovitz, Lori Alvino McGill , Wilkinson Walsh & Eskovitz, Paul J. Sampson , Wilkinson Walsh & Eskovitz & Sean Eskovitz , Wilkinson Walsh & Eskovitz LLP.

Puma Biotechnology, Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Brant W. Bishop , Wilkinson Walsh & Eskovitz, Pressly M. Millen , Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP, Lori Alvino McGill , Wilkinson Walsh & Eskovitz, Paul J. Sampson , Wilkinson Walsh & Eskovitz & Sean Eskovitz , Wilkinson Walsh & Eskovitz LLP.

Fredric N. Eshelman, Counter Defendant, represented by Thomas A. Clare , Clare Locke LLP, Dustin A. Pusch , Clare Locke LLP, Elizabeth M. Locke , Clare Locke LLP, Megan L. Meier , Clare Locke LLP & Andrew Kent McVey , Murchison, Taylor & Gibson, PLLC.

ORDER

Defendant Puma Biotechnology, Inc. ("Defendant") moves the court for leave to file a USB flash drive containing video clips of Plaintiff Fredric N. Eshelman's Congressional testimony, as referenced in Defendant's Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment and Statement of Undisputed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases