1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. BARRON v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
 

BARRON v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY

Case No. 1:17-cv-245.

Adam Barron, Plaintiff, v. BNSF Railway Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. North Dakota.

December 22, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Cause: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Nature of Suit: 330 Federal Employer's Liability
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Adam Barron, Plaintiff, represented by Cortney S. LeNeave , Hunegs, LeNeave & Kvas & David R. Paoli , Paoli Law Firm, P.C., pro hac vice.

BNSF Railway Company, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant, represented by Daniel A. Haws , HKM & Roland John Wells, III , HKM.

ORDER RE ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE

Before the court is a motion for attorney David R. Paoli to appear pro hac vice on behalf of plaintiff. In accordance with D.N.D. Gen. L.R. 1.3(D), attorney David R. Paoli has affirmed to submit to the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases