1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. POLSTER v. CITY OF WAUWATOSA
 

POLSTER v. CITY OF WAUWATOSA

Case No. 17-CV-3-JPS-JPS.

WILLIAM J. POLSTER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF WAUWATOSA, JEFFREY NEWMAN, RUSSELL RICHARDSON, THOMAS ORLOWSKI, JENNIFER FARINA, PHONEXAY YOTHSACKDA, and JEFFREY FARINA, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin.

December 13, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J Polster, Plaintiff, represented by Ben J. Slatky , Ademi & O'Reilly LLP.

William J Polster, Plaintiff, represented by Jesse Fruchter , Ademi & O'Reilly LLP, Mark A. Eldridge , Ademi & O'Reilly LLP & Robert K. O'Reilly , Ademi & O'Reilly LLP.

City of Wauwatosa, Defendant, represented by Ann C. Wirth , Gunta Law Offices SC, Gregg J. Gunta , Gunta Law Offices SC & John A. Wolfgang , Gunta Law Offices SC.

Jeffrey Newman, Defendant, represented by Ann C. Wirth , Gunta Law Offices SC, Gregg J. Gunta , Gunta Law Offices SC & John A. Wolfgang , Gunta Law Offices SC.

Russell Richardson, Defendant, represented by Ann C. Wirth , Gunta Law Offices SC, Gregg J. Gunta , Gunta Law Offices SC & John A. Wolfgang , Gunta Law Offices SC.

Thomas Orlowski, Defendant, represented by Ann C. Wirth , Gunta Law Offices SC, Gregg J. Gunta , Gunta Law Offices SC & John A. Wolfgang , Gunta Law Offices SC.

Jennifer Farina, Defendant, represented by Ann C. Wirth , Gunta Law Offices SC, Gregg J. Gunta , Gunta Law Offices SC & John A. Wolfgang , Gunta Law Offices SC.

Phonexay Yothsackda, Defendant, represented by Ann C. Wirth , Gunta Law Offices SC, Gregg J. Gunta , Gunta Law Offices SC & John A. Wolfgang , Gunta Law Offices SC.

Jeffrey Farina, Defendant, represented by Ann C. Wirth , Gunta Law Offices SC, Gregg J. Gunta , Gunta Law Offices SC & John A. Wolfgang , Gunta Law Offices SC.

ORDER

On December 13, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation of dismissal of this action with prejudice and without costs or fees assessed to either party. (Docket #58). The Court will adopt that stipulation. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases