1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. WORKMAN v. UNIVERSITY OF AKRON
 

WORKMAN v. UNIVERSITY OF AKRON

Case No. 5:16-cv-156.

DAYNA WORKMAN, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF AKRON, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

December 11, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Nature of Suit: 448 Civil Rights: Education
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dayna Workman, Plaintiff, represented by Brian D. Spitz , Spitz Law Firm.

Dayna Workman, Plaintiff, represented by Frederick M. Bean , Spitz Law Firm.

University of Akron, Defendant, represented by Anna M. Seidensticker , Office of the Attorney General - Employment Law & Lisa M. Critser , Office of the Attorney General - Education Section.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before the Court is the motion of defendant University of Akron ("UA") for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 on the claims of plaintiff Dayna Workman ("Workman") in this Title IX case. (Doc. No. 44 ["Mot."].) Workman opposes the motion (Doc. No. 53 ["Opp'n"]), and UA has filed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases