1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. HAND HELD PRODUCTS, INC. v. CODE CORPORATION
 

HAND HELD PRODUCTS, INC. v. CODE CORPORATION

Case No. 2:17-cv-00820-DN.

HAND HELD PRODUCTS, INC., d/b/a HONEYWELL SCANNING & MOBILITY, INTERMEC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, and INTERMEC IP CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v. THE CODE CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division.

December 8, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hand Held Products, doing business as Honeywell Scanning & Mobility, Plaintiff, represented by Brent P. Lorimer , WORKMAN NYDEGGER.

Hand Held Products, doing business as Honeywell Scanning & Mobility, Plaintiff, represented by Chad E. Nydegger , WORKMAN NYDEGGER, Eric C. Rusnak , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice, Mark G. Knedeisen , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice, Patrick J. McElhinny , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice & Ranjini Acharya , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice.

Intermec Technologies, Plaintiff, represented by Brent P. Lorimer , WORKMAN NYDEGGER, Chad E. Nydegger , WORKMAN NYDEGGER, Eric C. Rusnak , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice, Mark G. Knedeisen , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice, Patrick J. McElhinny , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice & Ranjini Acharya , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice.

Intermec IP, Plaintiff, represented by Brent P. Lorimer , WORKMAN NYDEGGER, Chad E. Nydegger , WORKMAN NYDEGGER, Eric C. Rusnak , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice, Mark G. Knedeisen , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice, Patrick J. McElhinny , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice & Ranjini Acharya , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice.

The Code Corporation, Consol Plaintiff, represented by Adam A. Hubbard , HOLLAND & HART LLP, pro hac vice, Benjamin N. Simler , HOLLAND & HART LLP, pro hac vice, Dawn Marie David , HOLLAND & HART, Mark A. Miller , HOLLAND & HART, Teague I. Donahey , HOLLAND & HART LLP, pro hac vice & Darren G. Reid , HOLLAND & HART.

Hand Held Products, doing business as Honeywell Scanning & Mobility, Consol Defendant, represented by Brent P. Lorimer , WORKMAN NYDEGGER, Chad E. Nydegger , WORKMAN NYDEGGER, Eric C. Rusnak , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice, Mark G. Knedeisen , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice, Patrick J. McElhinny , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice & Ranjini Acharya , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice.

Intermec Technologies, Consol Defendant, represented by Brent P. Lorimer , WORKMAN NYDEGGER, Chad E. Nydegger , WORKMAN NYDEGGER, Eric C. Rusnak , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice, Mark G. Knedeisen , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice, Patrick J. McElhinny , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice & Ranjini Acharya , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice.

Intermec IP, Consol Defendant, represented by Brent P. Lorimer , WORKMAN NYDEGGER, Chad E. Nydegger , WORKMAN NYDEGGER, Eric C. Rusnak , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice, Mark G. Knedeisen , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice, Patrick J. McElhinny , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice & Ranjini Acharya , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice.

Hand Held Products, Counter Defendant, represented by Brent P. Lorimer , WORKMAN NYDEGGER, Chad E. Nydegger , WORKMAN NYDEGGER, Eric C. Rusnak , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice, Mark G. Knedeisen , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice, Patrick J. McElhinny , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice & Ranjini Acharya , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice.

Intermec IP, Counter Defendant, represented by Brent P. Lorimer , WORKMAN NYDEGGER, Chad E. Nydegger , WORKMAN NYDEGGER, Eric C. Rusnak , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice, Mark G. Knedeisen , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice, Patrick J. McElhinny , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice & Ranjini Acharya , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice.

Intermec Technologies, Counter Defendant, represented by Brent P. Lorimer , WORKMAN NYDEGGER, Chad E. Nydegger , WORKMAN NYDEGGER, Eric C. Rusnak , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice, Mark G. Knedeisen , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice, Patrick J. McElhinny , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice & Ranjini Acharya , K&L GATES LLP, pro hac vice.

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING [98] PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO RETRANSFER CASE TO THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

The District of South Carolina transferred this case to the District of Utah1 on a motion to transfer by defendant, The Code Corporation ("Code").

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases