1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MILLER v. ZIMMER BIOMET INC.
 

MILLER v. ZIMMER BIOMET INC.

No. 2:17-cv-00265-JDL.

JANICE E. MILLER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ZIMMER BIOMET INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Maine.

November 30, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Product Liability
Nature of Suit: 365 Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

JANICE E MILLER, Plaintiff, represented by ANTHONY K. FERGUSON , FALES & FALES.

JANICE E MILLER, Plaintiff, represented by KELLY K. MCNABB , LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERSTEIN LLP, pro hac vice & WENDY FLEISHMAN , LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN LLP, pro hac vice.

DONALD MILLER, Plaintiff, represented by ANTHONY K. FERGUSON , FALES & FALES, KELLY K. MCNABB , LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERSTEIN LLP, pro hac vice & WENDY FLEISHMAN , LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN LLP, pro hac vice.

ZIMMER BIOMET INC, formerly known as ZIMMER INC, Defendant, represented by CHRISTOPHER C. TAINTOR , NORMAN, HANSON & DETROY, DOUGLAS L. PROCHNOW , FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS, LLP, pro hac vice, JORI M. LOREN , FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS, LLP, pro hac vice, MARK G. LAVOIE , NORMAN, HANSON & DETROY & PATRICK H. REILLY , FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS, LLP, pro hac vice.

ZIMMER BIOMET US INC, formerly known as ZIMMER US INC, Defendant, represented by CHRISTOPHER C. TAINTOR , NORMAN, HANSON & DETROY, DOUGLAS L. PROCHNOW , FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS, LLP, pro hac vice, JORI M. LOREN , FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS, LLP, pro hac vice, MARK G. LAVOIE , NORMAN, HANSON & DETROY & PATRICK H. REILLY , FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS, LLP, pro hac vice.

ZIMMER BIOMET HOLDINGS INC, formerly known as ZIMMER HOLDINGS, Defendant, represented by CHRISTOPHER C. TAINTOR , NORMAN, HANSON & DETROY, DOUGLAS L. PROCHNOW , FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS, LLP, pro hac vice, JORI M. LOREN , FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS, LLP, pro hac vice, MARK G. LAVOIE , NORMAN, HANSON & DETROY & PATRICK H. REILLY , FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS, LLP, pro hac vice.

RECOMMENDED DECISION ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

In this products liability action, Plaintiffs Janice and Donald Miller seek to recover for injuries they claim were caused by a defective hip implant designed and manufactured by Defendants.

The matter is before the Court on Defendants' motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases