1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 280 F.Supp.3d
  5. 280 F.Supp.3d 823 (2017)
 

SYNOPSYS, INC. v. MATAL

Case No. 1:17-cv-517.

280 F.Supp.3d 823 (2017)

SYNOPSYS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Joseph MATAL, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division.

Signed November 15, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Cause: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Nature of Suit: 899 Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act / Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sten A. Jensen , Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

R. Trent McCotter , US Attorney's Office, Alexandria, VA, for Defendants.

Bradley Charles Wright , Banner & Witcoff Ltd., Washington, DC, for Intervenor Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an Administrative Procedure Act ("APA")2 appeal from a decision by the Director of the United States Patent & Trademark Office ("PTO"), vacating an order granting ex parte reexamination of Patent No....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases