1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 292 F.Supp.3d
  5. 292 F.Supp.3d 157 (2017)
 

SHARP CORP. v. HISENSE USA CORP.

Civil Action No. 17-1648 (JEB).

292 F.Supp.3d 157 (2017)

SHARP CORPORATION and Sharp Electronics Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. HISENSE USA CORPORATION and Hisense International (Hong Kong) America Investment Co. Ltd., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

Signed November 13, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 09 U.S.C. § 0202
Cause: 09 U.S.C. § 0202 Award under Convention on Foreign Arbitral Awards
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin William Weigand , Nicholas Martin DePalma , Randall K. Miller , Venable LLP, Tysons Corner, VA, for Plaintiffs.

Francis A. Vasquez, Jr. , White & Case LLP, Washington, DC, David G. Hille , Pro Hac Vice, Gregory M. Starner , Pro Hac Vice, White & Case LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Should a federal court stand idly by when a foreign arbitral commission issues an order restricting the speech of a private party? Actually, yes. Here, two Asian television manufacturers, Sharp and Hisense, entered into a 2015 licensing agreement under which Hisense would...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases