Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Henry Barabin, Plaintiff, represented by Gilbert L. Purcell , BRAYTON PURCELL LLP, pro hac vice.
Henry Barabin, Plaintiff, represented by Hannah E. Shangraw , BRAYTON PURCELL LLP, pro hac vice, James P. Nevin , BRAYTON PURCELL LLP, pro hac vice, Cameron O. Carter , SHAW LAW GROUP & Meredith B. Good , BRAYTON PURCELL LLP.
Geraldine Barabin, Plaintiff, represented by Gilbert L. Purcell , BRAYTON PURCELL LLP, pro hac vice, Hannah E. Shangraw , BRAYTON PURCELL LLP, pro hac vice, James P. Nevin , BRAYTON PURCELL LLP, pro hac vice, Cameron O. Carter , SHAW LAW GROUP & Meredith B. Good , BRAYTON PURCELL LLP.
AstenJohnson Inc, Defendant, represented by Forrest Ren Wilkes , COSMICH SIMMONS & BROWN, PLLC, pro hac vice, Martha Rodriguez-Lopez , K&L GATES LLP, J. Scott Wood , FOLEY & MANSFIELD & James P. Brady , FOLEY & MANSFIELD.
Scapa Dryer Fabrics Inc, Defendant, represented by H. Lane Young, II , HAWKINS PARNELL THACKSTON & YOUNG LLP, pro hac vice, Robert B. Gilbreath , HAWKINS PARNELL & THACKSTON LLP, pro hac vice, S. Christopher Collier , HAWKINS PARNELL THACKSTON & YOUNG LLP, pro hac vice, Eliot M. Harris , WILLIAMS KASTNER & Nicole R. MacKenzie , WILLIAMS KASTNER & GIBBS.
ORDER
JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.
A representative for Plaintiff Geraldine Barabin contacted the court to request a discovery conference regarding (1) Ms. Barabin's ability to retake a deposition of Defendant AstenJohnson, Inc., and (2) the scope of that deposition. The court ORDERS the parties to file statements of no more than three (3) pages further explaining the nature of the disputed discovery, setting forth the appropriate legal standard, and providing brief argument in support of the party's position. The parties must file these statements no later than Friday, November 10, 2017, at 5:00 p.m.
The court further ORDERS the parties to appear at a telephonic hearing on Tuesday, November 14, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. The undersigned judge's Courtroom Deputy will contact the parties with instructions for appearing at the telephonic hearing. If the parties resolve this dispute prior to the conference, they are instructed to notify the court immediately.
Comment
User Comments