1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MLC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LLC v. MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.
 

MLC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LLC v. MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Case No. 14-cv-03657-SI.

MLC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

November 1, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

MLC Intellectual Property, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Fabio Elia Marino , McDermott Will & Emery.

MLC Intellectual Property, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Barrington E. Dyer , McDermott Will Emery LLP, Laura Kieran Kieckhefer , McDermott Will & Emery & Robert Andrew Schwentker , Fish and Richardson P.C..

Micron Technology, Inc., Defendant, represented by Michael Richard Headley , Fish & Richardson P.C., Adam Ryan Shartzer , Fish and Richardson P.C., Anthony Van Nguyen , Fish and Richardson, P.C., pro hac vice, Jonathan Benjamin Bright , Fish and Richardson P.C., pro hac vice, Michael R. Ellis , Fish and Richardson P.C., Robert Andrew Schwentker , Fish & Richardson P.C., pro hac vice, Ruffin B. Cordell , Fish & Richardson P.C., pro hac vice & Timothy Wayne Riffe , Fish & Richardson PC, pro hac vice.

Micron Technology, Inc, Defendant, represented by Michael Richard Headley , Fish & Richardson P.C., Robert Andrew Schwentker , Fish and Richardson P.C. & Timothy Wayne Riffe , Fish & Richardson PC.

Micron Technology, Inc., Counter-claimant, represented by Adam Ryan Shartzer , Fish and Richardson P.C., Anthony Van Nguyen , Fish and Richardson, P.C., pro hac vice, Michael Richard Headley , Fish & Richardson P.C., Robert Andrew Schwentker , Fish and Richardson P.C., pro hac vice, Ruffin B. Cordell , Fish & Richardson P.C., pro hac vice & Timothy Wayne Riffe , Fish & Richardson PC, pro hac vice.

MLC Intellectual Property, LLC, Counter-defendant, represented by Fabio Elia Marino , McDermott Will & Emery, Barrington E. Dyer , McDermott Will Emery LLP & Laura Kieran Kieckhefer , McDermott Will & Emery.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL PENDING DISCOVERY MOTION

Re: Dkt. Nos. 148, 175.

Now before the Court are two pending matters: (1) defendant's motion for leave to amend its answer and counterclaims, and (2) a joint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases