1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SEIBERT v. DORNING
 

SEIBERT v. DORNING

Case No. 5:17-cv-00918-MHH-JHE.

CARL MICHAEL SEIBERT, Petitioner, v. SHERIFF BLAKE DORNING, et al., Respondents.

United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Northeastern Division.

October 25, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nature of Suit: 530 Habeas Corpus (General)
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl Michael Seibert, Petitioner, Pro Se.

Blake Dorning, Respondent, represented by Tracy M. Daniel , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.

Steve Marshall, Respondent, represented by Tracy M. Daniel , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 29, 2017, the magistrate judge entered a report in which he recommended that the Court dismiss without prejudice petitioner Carl Michael Seibert's petition for writ of habeas corpus because Mr. Seibert did not adequately exhaust his state court remedies for purposes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases