1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. TATE v. PROGRESSIVE FINANCE HOLDINGS, LLC
 

TATE v. PROGRESSIVE FINANCE HOLDINGS, LLC

Case No. 2:17-cv-01589-ODW (ASx).

JOEY TATE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE FINANCE HOLDINGS, LLC, Defendant.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

October 24, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Cause: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joey Tate, Plaintiff, represented by Trinette Gragirena Kent , Lemberg Law LLC.

Progressive Finance Holdings, LLC., Defendant, represented by Scott M. Pearson , Ballard Spahr LLP & Taylor Robert Steinbacher , Ballard Spahr LLP.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND DISMISS PROCEEDINGS [15]

I. INTRODUCTION

On June 2, 2017, Defendant Progressive Finance Holdings, LLC moved to compel arbitration, and to either dismiss or stay these proceedings pending the outcome of arbitration. (Mot., ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases