1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. McFARLAND v. LONG
 

McFARLAND v. LONG

Case No. 2:16-cv-00930-RFB-PAL.

MICHAEL MCFARLAND, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL R. LONG, et al. Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

October 6, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Nature of Suit: 160 Stockholders Suits
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael McFarland, Plaintiff, represented by John P. Aldrich , Aldrich Law Firm, Ltd..

Michael McFarland, Plaintiff, represented by Justin G. Sherman , Levi & Korinsky LLP, pro hac vice & Nicholas I. Porritt , pro hac vice.

Michael R Long, Defendant, represented by Bruce Alverson , Alverson Taylor Mortensen & Sanders, Peter Stokes , Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. & Karie N. Wilson , Alverson Taylor Mortensen & Sanders.

Louis A Hoch, Defendant, represented by Bruce Alverson , Alverson Taylor Mortensen & Sanders, Peter Stokes , Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. & Karie N. Wilson , Alverson Taylor Mortensen & Sanders.

Larry Morrison, Defendant, represented by Bruce Alverson , Alverson Taylor Mortensen & Sanders, Peter Stokes , Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. & Karie N. Wilson , Alverson Taylor Mortensen & Sanders.

Kenneth Keller, Defendant, represented by Bruce Alverson , Alverson Taylor Mortensen & Sanders, Peter Stokes , Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. & Karie N. Wilson , Alverson Taylor Mortensen & Sanders.

Peter G Kirby, Defendant, represented by Bruce Alverson , Alverson Taylor Mortensen & Sanders, Peter Stokes , Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. & Karie N. Wilson , Alverson Taylor Mortensen & Sanders.

Payment Data Systems, Inc., Nominal Defendant, represented by John P. Aldrich , Aldrich Law Firm, Ltd., Peter Stokes , Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., Peter A. Stokes , Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, pro hac vice & Karie N. Wilson , Alverson Taylor Mortensen & Sanders.

ORDER

I. INTRODUCTION

This case is before the Court on Defendant Louis A. Hoch's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 31) and Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 52). Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 31), which joined Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 12 and 18) in full, is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases