IN RE INTUITIVE SURGICAL SECURITIES LITIGATION

Case No. 5:13-cv-01920-EJD.

IN RE INTUITIVE SURGICAL SECURITIES LITIGATION.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

September 29, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Nature of Suit: 850 Securities/Commodities
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Spencer Abrams, Plaintiff, represented by Arthur Charles Leahy , Robbins Geller Rudman & dowd LLP.

Spencer Abrams, Plaintiff, represented by Mary K. Blasy , Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Shawn A. Williams , Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP & Danielle Suzanne Myers , Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP.

Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii, Plaintiff, represented by Alec T. Coquin , Labaton Sucharow LLP, pro hac vice, Carol C. Villegas , Labaton Sucharow LLP, Christine M. Fox , Labaton Sucharow LLP, Eric J. Belfi , Labaton Sucharow & Rudoff LLP, Jonathan Gardner , Labaton Sucharow LLP, pro hac vice, Jonathan M. Plasse , Goodkind Labation Rudoff & Sucharow LLP, Mark S. Arisohn , Labaton Sucharow LLP, pro hac vice, Michael Walter Stocker , Labaton Sucharow LLP, Samuel De Villiers , Labaton Sucharow LLP, Serena Hallowell , Labaton Sucharow LLP, pro hac vice, Theodore J. Hawkins , Labaton Sucharow LLP, Danielle Suzanne Myers , Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Ekaterini Maria Polychronopoulos , Robbins Geller Rudman and Dowd LLP, Ivo Michael Labar , Kerr & Wagstaffe LLP, James Matthew Wagstaffe , Kerr & Wagstaffe LLP, Shawn A. Williams , Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Susannah Ruth Conn , Robbins Geller Rudman and Dowd LLP & Yah E. Demann , Labaton Sucharow LLP.

Greater Pennsylvania Carpenters' Pension Fund, Plaintiff, represented by Carol C. Villegas , Labaton Sucharow LLP, Christine M. Fox , Labaton Sucharow LLP, Jonathan Gardner , Labaton Sucharow LLP, Michael Walter Stocker , Labaton Sucharow LLP, Serena Hallowell , Labaton Sucharow LLP, Theodore J. Hawkins , Labaton Sucharow LLP, Ivo Michael Labar , Kerr & Wagstaffe LLP, James Matthew Wagstaffe , Kerr & Wagstaffe LLP, Shawn A. Williams , Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Susannah Ruth Conn , Robbins Geller Rudman and Dowd LLP & Danielle Suzanne Myers , Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP.

Public School Teachers' Pension and Retirement Fund of Chicago, Plaintiff, represented by Jennifer Rae Crutchfield , Cotchett Pitre and McCarthy LLP.

Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Defendant, represented by Alexander Barnes Dryer , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Cody Shawn Harris , Keker and Van Nest LLP, Jo W. Golub , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, John Watkins Keker , Keker & Van Nest LLP, Kate Ellis Lazarus , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Michael D. Celio , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Philip James Tassin , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Reid Patrick Mullen , Keker and Van Nest LLP & Laurie Carr Mims , Keker Van Nes & Peters LLP.

Lonnie Smith, Defendant, represented by Alexander Barnes Dryer , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Cody Shawn Harris , Keker and Van Nest LLP, Jo W. Golub , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, John Watkins Keker , Keker & Van Nest LLP, Michael D. Celio , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Philip James Tassin , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Reid Patrick Mullen , Keker and Van Nest LLP, Kate Ellis Lazarus , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP & Laurie Carr Mims , Keker Van Nes & Peters LLP.

Gary Guthart, Defendant, represented by Alexander Barnes Dryer , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Cody Shawn Harris , Keker and Van Nest LLP, Jo W. Golub , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, John Watkins Keker , Keker & Van Nest LLP, Michael D. Celio , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Philip James Tassin , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Reid Patrick Mullen , Keker and Van Nest LLP, Kate Ellis Lazarus , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP & Laurie Carr Mims , Keker Van Nes & Peters LLP.

Salvatore J. Brogna, Defendant, represented by Cody Shawn Harris , Keker and Van Nest LLP, Jo W. Golub , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Michael D. Celio , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Philip James Tassin , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP & Reid Patrick Mullen , Keker and Van Nest LLP.

Augusto V. Castello, Defendant, represented by Cody Shawn Harris , Keker and Van Nest LLP, Jo W. Golub , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Michael D. Celio , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Philip James Tassin , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP & Reid Patrick Mullen , Keker and Van Nest LLP.

Jerome McNamara, Defendant, represented by Cody Shawn Harris , Keker and Van Nest LLP, Jo W. Golub , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Michael D. Celio , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Philip James Tassin , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP & Reid Patrick Mullen , Keker and Van Nest LLP.

Mark J. Meltzer, Defendant, represented by Cody Shawn Harris , Keker and Van Nest LLP, Jo W. Golub , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Michael D. Celio , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Philip James Tassin , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP & Reid Patrick Mullen , Keker and Van Nest LLP.

Marshall L. Mohr, Defendant, represented by Alexander Barnes Dryer , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Cody Shawn Harris , Keker and Van Nest LLP, Jo W. Golub , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, John Watkins Keker , Keker & Van Nest LLP, Michael D. Celio , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Philip James Tassin , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Reid Patrick Mullen , Keker and Van Nest LLP, Kate Ellis Lazarus , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP & Laurie Carr Mims , Keker Van Nes & Peters LLP.

Colin Morales, Defendant, represented by Cody Shawn Harris , Keker and Van Nest LLP, Jo W. Golub , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Michael D. Celio , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Philip James Tassin , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP & Reid Patrick Mullen , Keker and Van Nest LLP.

David Rosa, Defendant, represented by Cody Shawn Harris , Keker and Van Nest LLP, Jo W. Golub , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Michael D. Celio , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Philip James Tassin , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP & Reid Patrick Mullen , Keker and Van Nest LLP.

Darian Adel, Movant, represented by Jeremy A. Lieberman , Pomerantz LLP, pro hac vice & Michael M. Goldberg , Goldberg Law PC.


ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT; DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION RE CLASS CERTIFICATION

Re: Dkt. No. 215, 227

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a securities fraud class action suit. Presently before the Court is Defendants' motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases