1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MAHEAU v. XTO ENERGY, INC.
 

MAHEAU v. XTO ENERGY, INC.

Case No. 1:17-cv-102.

Richard Chadwick Maheau, et. al., Plaintiffs, v. XTO Energy, Inc., et. al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. North Dakota.

September 18, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Personal Injury
Nature of Suit: 360 P.I.: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Chadwick Maheu, Plaintiff, represented by Ryan R. Shaffer , Meyer, Shaffer & Stepans, PLLP.

Richard Chadwick Maheu, Plaintiff, represented by Richard H. Honaker , Honaker Law Offices, LC.

Janie Williams, Plaintiff, represented by Ryan R. Shaffer , Meyer, Shaffer & Stepans, PLLP & Richard H. Honaker , Honaker Law Offices, LC.

Joseph C. Guillen, Plaintiff, represented by Ryan R. Shaffer , Meyer, Shaffer & Stepans, PLLP & Richard H. Honaker , Honaker Law Offices, LC.

Courtney Mann, Plaintiff, represented by Ryan R. Shaffer , Meyer, Shaffer & Stepans, PLLP & Richard H. Honaker , Honaker Law Offices, LC.

XTO Energy Inc., Defendant, represented by Jessica Schmidt , Holland & Hart LLP.

Badlands Consulting, LLC, Defendant, represented by C. Todd Koebele , HKM & Roland John Wells, III , HKM.

Petroleum Experience, Inc., Defendant, represented by Paul R. Sanderson , Evenson Sanderson, PC & William J. Behrmann , Evenson Sanderson, PC.

KLX Energy Services, LLC, Defendant, represented by Courtney A. Presthus , Ebeltoft Sickler Lawyers PLLC.

Weatherford International, LLC, Defendant, represented by Jeffrey S. Davis , GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP & Mary Elizondo Frazier , GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP.

Weatherford U.S., L.P., Defendant, represented by Jeffrey S. Davis , GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP & Mary Elizondo Frazier , GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP.

Allan Kolden, Defendant, represented by Paul R. Sanderson , Evenson Sanderson, PC & William J. Behrmann , Evenson Sanderson, PC.

Thomas Jones, Defendant, represented by C. Todd Koebele , HKM & Roland John Wells, III , HKM.

ORDER FOR RULE 26(f) PLANNING MEETING AND RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, AND ORDER RE RESOLUTION OF DISCOVERY DISPUTES

IT IS ORDERED:

RULE 26(f) MEETING & RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

The court shall hold a Rule 16(b) initial pretrial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases