1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. LEI PAW v. U.S.
 

LEI PAW v. U.S.

Case No. 17-cv-0532 BTM (JLB).

SUE THA LEI PAW, FRIDAY MOE RO, NYIEN NYIEN AYE, WIN HTUT, TAR LUE, and YOON WADY FOOD STORE, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. California.

August 22, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 07 U.S.C. § 2023(a)
Cause: 07 U.S.C. § 2023(a) Judicial Review of Food Stamp Disqualification
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sue Tha Lei Paw, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew Zachary Tapp , Metropolitan Law Group, PLLC, pro hac vice.

Sue Tha Lei Paw, Plaintiff, represented by Frank S. Clowney, III , Law Offices of Frank S Clowney III.

Friday Moe Ro, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew Zachary Tapp , Metropolitan Law Group, PLLC, pro hac vice & Frank S. Clowney, III , Law Offices of Frank S Clowney III.

Nyien Nyien Aye, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew Zachary Tapp , Metropolitan Law Group, PLLC, pro hac vice & Frank S. Clowney, III , Law Offices of Frank S Clowney III.

Win Htut, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew Zachary Tapp , Metropolitan Law Group, PLLC, pro hac vice & Frank S. Clowney, III , Law Offices of Frank S Clowney III.

Tar Lue, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew Zachary Tapp , Metropolitan Law Group, PLLC, pro hac vice & Frank S. Clowney, III , Law Offices of Frank S Clowney III.

Yoon Wady Food Store, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew Zachary Tapp , Metropolitan Law Group, PLLC, pro hac vice & Frank S. Clowney, III , Law Offices of Frank S Clowney III.

United States of America, Defendant, represented by U S Attorney CV, U S Attorneys Office Southern District of California.

United States of America, Defendant, represented by Daniel Everett Butcher , U S Attorneys Office Southern District of California.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, AND TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR STAY COURT'S ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[ECF No. 9]

On March 16, 2017, Plaintiffs filed this action as a judicial appeal of an administrative determination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases