BILAL v. IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

No. 4:16-cv-675-DPM.

KASIB TAUHEED BILAL, Plaintiff, v. IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kasib Tauheed Bilal, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company, Defendant, represented by Mark Steven Breeding , Munson, Rowlett, Moore & Boone, P.A..


ORDER

D. P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge.

Bilal's motion for an extension, No 48, is granted reluctantly. The Court extends Bilal's time to respond to the motion for summary judgment to 22 September 2017. This is the second extension. The first one was lengthy. No further extension will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. And Bilal must respond by the deadline whether he has found a lawyer by then or not. As the Court has said repeatedly, this case is not so complex that counsel is essential for Bilal to present his side.

IDS's status report, No 49, is noted and appreciated.

So Ordered.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases