1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SPIES v. EL DORADO COUNTY
 

SPIES v. EL DORADO COUNTY

No. 2:16-CV-02232-WBS-GGH.

LAWRENCE SPIES, SR., et al., Plaintiffs, v. EL DORADO COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

July 24, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence Spies, Sr., Plaintiff, represented by Michael Aaron Schaps , The Schaps Law Firm, APC.

Lawrence Spies, Sr., Plaintiff, represented by Stewart Lee Katz , Law Office of Stewart Katz.

Linda Spies, Plaintiff, represented by Michael Aaron Schaps , The Schaps Law Firm, APC & Stewart Lee Katz , Law Office of Stewart Katz.

Lawrence Spies, Jr., Plaintiff, represented by Michael Aaron Schaps , The Schaps Law Firm, APC & Stewart Lee Katz , Law Office of Stewart Katz.

El Dorado County, Defendant, represented by Amie Collins McTavish , Angelo Kilday and Kilduf.

California Forensic Medical Group Inc., Defendant, represented by Jerome Martin Varanini , Law Offices of Jerome M. Varanini.

Marshall Medical Center, Defendant, represented by Kat Todd , Schuering Zimmerman & Doyle, LLP.

John D'Agostini, Defendant, represented by Amie Collins McTavish , Angelo Kilday and Kilduf.

Randy Peshon, Defendant, represented by Amie Collins McTavish , Angelo Kilday and Kilduf.

Matt Foxworthy, Defendant, represented by Amie Collins McTavish , Angelo Kilday and Kilduf.

Jackie Noren, Defendant, represented by Amie Collins McTavish , Angelo Kilday and Kilduf.

Robin Hope, Defendant, represented by Jerome Martin Varanini , Law Offices of Jerome M. Varanini.

Raymond Herr, Defendant, represented by Jerome Martin Varanini , Law Offices of Jerome M. Varanini.

Lisa Issacson, Defendant, represented by Jerome Martin Varanini , Law Offices of Jerome M. Varanini.

Taylor Fithian, Defendant, represented by Jerome Martin Varanini , Law Offices of Jerome M. Varanini.

Mark Hangebrauck, Defendant, represented by Amie Collins McTavish , Angelo Kilday and Kilduf.

John Skratt, Defendant, represented by Allison Cherry Lafferty , Kroloff, Belcher, Smart, Perry & Christopherson.

Alexis F. Lieser, Defendant, represented by Allison Cherry Lafferty , Kroloff, Belcher, Smart, Perry & Christopherson.

ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF RULE 56 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The Court herein finds good cause exists to continue defendant Marshall Medical Center's Rule 56 Motion for Summary Judgment. Good cause exists to continue the Rule 56 Motion for Summary Judgment from August 7, 2017 due to the unavailability...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases