1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S. AND STATE EX REL. O'NEILL v. SOMNIA, INC.
 

U.S. AND STATE EX REL. O'NEILL v. SOMNIA, INC.

No. 1:15-cv-00433-GSA-DAD.

UNITED STATES and the STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. NICOLE O'NEILL, and NICOLE, Plaintiff, v. SOMNIA, INC., PRIMARY ANESTHESIA SERVICES, McKESSON CORPORATION, ROBERT GOLDSTEIN, M.D., ROY WINSTON, M.D., BYRON MENDENHALL, M.D., QUINN GEE, M.D., and MARGARET VASSILEV, M.D., and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

June 29, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Cause: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Nature of Suit: 375 Other Statutes: False Claims Act
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

United States of America, Plaintiff, represented by Michael Anderson Berry , United States Attorney's Office.

State of California, Plaintiff, represented by Isabel Melissa Daniels , Schonbrun DeSimone Seplow Harris & Hoffman LLP & Wilmer J. Harris , Schonbrun DeSimone Seplow Harris Hoffman.

Nicole O'Neill, Plaintiff, represented by Isabel Melissa Daniels , Schonbrun DeSimone Seplow Harris & Hoffman LLP, Wilmer J. Harris , Schonbrun DeSimone Seplow Harris Hoffman & Michael D. Seplow , Schonbrun Seplow Harris and Hoffman LLP.

Somina, Inc., Defendant, represented by Brian K. French , Nixon Peabody LLP, pro hac vice & Michael R. Lindsay , Nixon Peabody LLP.

Primary Anesthesia Services, Defendant, represented by Brian K. French , Nixon Peabody LLP, pro hac vice & Michael R. Lindsay , Nixon Peabody LLP.

McKesson Corporation, Defendant, represented by William Scott Cameron , King & Spalding.

Byron Mendenhall, Defendant, represented by Brian K. French , Nixon Peabody LLP, pro hac vice & Michael R. Lindsay , Nixon Peabody LLP.

Quinn Gee, Defendant, represented by Brian K. French , Nixon Peabody LLP, pro hac vice & Michael R. Lindsay , Nixon Peabody LLP.

Margaret Vassilev, M.D., Defendant, represented by Brian K. French , Nixon Peabody LLP, pro hac vice & Michael R. Lindsay , Nixon Peabody LLP.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DENY MOTIONS TO DISMISS AS MOOT

(Doc. No. 39 at 2.)

The parties' have submitted a stipulation that plaintiff be granted leave to file a first amended complaint in this action. (Doc. No. 39.) By way of background, on June 7, 2017...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases