IN RE JUNO THERAPEUTICS, INC.

Case No. C16-1069RSM.

In re: JUNO THERAPEUTICS, INC.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle.

June 14, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a)
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Nature of Suit: 850 Securities / Commodities
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Man Nguyen, Movant, represented by Clifford A. Cantor .

Gilbert Hoang Nguyen, Movant, represented by Jeremy A. Lieberman , POMERANATZ LLP, pro hac vice, Joseph Alexander Hood, II , POMERANTZ LLP, pro hac vice, Leigh Handelman Smollar , POMERANTZ LLP, pro hac vice, Omar Jafri , POMERANTZ LLP, pro hac vice & Clifford A. Cantor .

Goce Veljanoski, Plaintiff, represented by Janissa Ann Strabuk , TOUSLEY BRAIN STEPHENS, Jeffrey C. Block , BLOCK & LEVITON LLP, pro hac vice, Joel Fleming , BLOCK & LEVITON LLP, pro hac vice & Kim D. Stephens , TOUSLEY BRAIN STEPHENS.

Liberata Paradisco, Plaintiff, represented by Duncan Calvert Turner , BADGLEY MULLINS TURNER PLLC.

Jiayi Wan, Plaintiff, represented by Jeremy A. Lieberman , POMERANATZ LLP, pro hac vice, Joseph Alexander Hood, II , POMERANTZ LLP, pro hac vice, Patrick V. Dahlstrom , POMERANTZ LLP, pro hac vice & Clifford A. Cantor .

Gilbert Hoang Nguyen, Plaintiff, represented by Patrick V. Dahlstrom , POMERANTZ LLP, pro hac vice & Clifford A. Cantor .

Juno Therapeutics Inc, Defendant, represented by Drew Liming , WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, pro hac vice, Ignacio E. Salceda , WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, pro hac vice, Joni Ostler , WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, pro hac vice, Nina F. Locker , WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, pro hac vice & Gregory Lewis Watts , WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI.

Hans E Bishop, Defendant, represented by Drew Liming , WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, pro hac vice, Ignacio E. Salceda , WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, pro hac vice, Joni Ostler , WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, pro hac vice, Nina F. Locker , WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, pro hac vice & Gregory Lewis Watts , WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI.


ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Dkt. #55. Defendants' argue that Plaintiffs fail to plead certain necessary elements of their securities claims. In Response, Plaintiffs argue that their pleading...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases