1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. HAND HELD PRODUCTS, INC. v. THE CODE CORPORATION
 

HAND HELD PRODUCTS, INC. v. THE CODE CORPORATION

Civil Action No. 17-167-RMG.

Hand Held Products, Inc., d/b/a Honeywell Scanning & Mobility; Intermec Technologies Corporation; and Intermec IP Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. The Code Corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division.

June 9, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hand Held Products Inc, Plaintiff, represented by Eric Christopher Rusnak , K and L Gates, pro hac vice.

Hand Held Products Inc, Plaintiff, represented by James Walker Coleman, IV , K&L Gates, Jennifer Hess Thiem , K&L Gates, Mark George Knedeisen , K&L Gates, pro hac vice, Patrick McElhinny , K&L Gates, pro hac vice, Ranjini Acharya , K and L Gates, pro hac vice & Richard Ashby Farrier, Jr. , K&L Gates.

Intermec Technologies Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Eric Christopher Rusnak , K and L Gates, pro hac vice, James Walker Coleman, IV , K&L Gates, Jennifer Hess Thiem , K&L Gates, Mark George Knedeisen , K&L Gates, pro hac vice, Patrick McElhinny , K&L Gates, pro hac vice, Ranjini Acharya , K and L Gates, pro hac vice & Richard Ashby Farrier, Jr. , K&L Gates.

Intermec IP Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Eric Christopher Rusnak , K and L Gates, pro hac vice, James Walker Coleman, IV , K&L Gates, Jennifer Hess Thiem , K&L Gates, Mark George Knedeisen , K&L Gates, pro hac vice, Patrick McElhinny , K&L Gates, pro hac vice, Ranjini Acharya , K and L Gates, pro hac vice & Richard Ashby Farrier, Jr. , K&L Gates.

The Code Corporation,, Defendant, represented by Douglas Aaron Cawley , McKool Smith PC, pro hac vice.

The Code Corporation, Defendant, represented by Richard Alan Kamprath , McKool Smith PC, pro hac vice & Sally Corbette Newman .

The Code Corporation, Counter Claimant, represented by Douglas Aaron Cawley , McKool Smith PC, Richard Alan Kamprath , McKool Smith PC & Sally Corbette Newman .

Hand Held Products Inc, Counter Defendant, represented by Eric Christopher Rusnak , K and L Gates, James Walker Coleman, IV , K&L Gates, Mark George Knedeisen , K&L Gates, Patrick McElhinny , K&L Gates, Ranjini Acharya , K and L Gates & Richard Ashby Farrier, Jr. , K&L Gates.

Intermec IP Corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by Eric Christopher Rusnak , K and L Gates, James Walker Coleman, IV , K&L Gates, Mark George Knedeisen , K&L Gates, Patrick McElhinny , K&L Gates, Ranjini Acharya , K and L Gates & Richard Ashby Farrier, Jr. , K&L Gates.

Intermec Technologies Corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by Eric Christopher Rusnak , K and L Gates, James Walker Coleman, IV , K&L Gates, Mark George Knedeisen , K&L Gates, Patrick McElhinny , K&L Gates, Ranjini Acharya , K and L Gates & Richard Ashby Farrier, Jr. , K&L Gates.

The Code Corporation, Counter Claimant, represented by Douglas Aaron Cawley , McKool Smith PC, Richard Alan Kamprath , McKool Smith PC & Sally Corbette Newman .

Hand Held Products Inc, Counter Defendant, represented by Eric Christopher Rusnak , K and L Gates, James Walker Coleman, IV , K&L Gates, Jennifer Hess Thiem , K&L Gates, Mark George Knedeisen , K&L Gates, Patrick McElhinny , K&L Gates, Ranjini Acharya , K and L Gates & Richard Ashby Farrier, Jr. , K&L Gates.

Intermec IP Corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by Eric Christopher Rusnak , K and L Gates, James Walker Coleman, IV , K&L Gates, Jennifer Hess Thiem , K&L Gates, Mark George Knedeisen , K&L Gates, Patrick McElhinny , K&L Gates, Ranjini Acharya , K and L Gates & Richard Ashby Farrier, Jr. , K&L Gates.

Intermec Technologies Corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by Eric Christopher Rusnak , K and L Gates, James Walker Coleman, IV , K&L Gates, Jennifer Hess Thiem , K&L Gates, Mark George Knedeisen , K&L Gates, Patrick McElhinny , K&L Gates, Ranjini Acharya , K and L Gates & Richard Ashby Farrier, Jr. , K&L Gates.

ORDER AND OPINION

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss Defendant's counterclaims and to strike in part Defendant's affirmative defenses (Dkt. No. 51). For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the motion.

I. Background...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases