TMK IPSCO v. U.S.

Slip Op. 17-54 Consol. Court No. 10-00055.

222 F.Supp.3d 1306 (2017)

TMK IPSCO, et al., Plaintiffs and Consolidated Plaintiffs, and Maverick Tube Corporation, et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors and Consolidated Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Tianjin Pipe (Group) Corp. and Tianjin Pipe International Economic & Trading Corp., Defendant-Intervenors and Consolidated Defendant-Intervenors.

United States Court of International Trade.

May 3, 2017.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger Brian Schagrin , Christopher Todd Cloutier , John Winthrop Bohn , Jordan Charles Kahn , and Paul Wright Jameson , Schagrin Associates, of Washington, DC, for plaintiffs and consolidated plaintiff-intervenors TMK IPSCO, V & M Star L.P., Wheatland Tube Corp., Evraz Rocky Mountain Steel, and United Steelworkers.

Alan Hayden Price and Robert Edward DeFrancesco, III , Wiley Rein, LLP, of Washington, DC, for consolidated plaintiff and consolidated plaintiff-intervenor Maverick Tube Corporation.

Debbie Leilani Shon , Jon David Corey , Jonathan Gordon Cooper , and Kelsey Marie Rule , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, of Washington, DC, for consolidated plaintiff and consolidated plaintiff-intervenor United States Steel Corporation.

Loren Misha Preheim , Assistant Director, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Commercial Litigation Branch, of Washington, DC. for defendant. With him on the brief were Chad A. Readler , Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson , Director, and Claudia Burke , Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was Shelby Mitchell Anderson , Attorney, U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of the Chief Counsel for Trade Enforcement & Compliance, of Washington, DC.

Daniel Lewis Porter , William Henry Barringer , and Matthew Paul McCullough , Curtis Mallet-Prevost , Colt & Mosle LLP, of Washington, DC, for defendant-intervenors and consolidated defendant-intervenors.


OPINION

Before the court for review is the U.S. Department of Commerce's ("Department" or "Commerce") Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand filed pursuant to the court's decision in TMK IPSCO v. United States, 40 CIT ___, ___, 179 F.Supp.3d 1328 (2016).

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases