NEVADA WEST PETROLEUM, LLC v. BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS, LLC

Case No. 2:15-cv-01684-APG-PAL.

NEVADA WEST PETROLEUM, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS, LLC, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

May 5, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 2801
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 2801 Petroleum Marketing Practices Act
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nevada West Petroleum, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher A. Turtzo , Morris, Sullivan, Lemkul & Pitegoff.

Nevada West Petroleum, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Jeffrey I. Pitegoff , Morris, Sullivan, Lemkul & Pitegoff.

Qaraman Mesquite, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher A. Turtzo , Morris, Sullivan, Lemkul & Pitegoff & Jeffrey I. Pitegoff , Morris, Sullivan, Lemkul & Pitegoff.

Qaraman Sunset / Decatur, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher A. Turtzo , Morris, Sullivan, Lemkul & Pitegoff & Jeffrey I. Pitegoff , Morris, Sullivan, Lemkul & Pitegoff.

Wasef Qaraman, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher A. Turtzo , Morris, Sullivan, Lemkul & Pitegoff & Jeffrey I. Pitegoff , Morris, Sullivan, Lemkul & Pitegoff.

BP West Coast Products, LLC, Defendant, represented by Christopher H. Byrd , Fennemore Craig Jones Vargas, Courtney R. Beller , Fennemore Craig, Douglas C. Northup , Fennemore Craig PC, pro hac vice & Karl L. Nielson , Smith Larsen & Wixom.

Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company, LLC, Defendant, represented by Christopher H. Byrd , Fennemore Craig Jones Vargas, Courtney R. Beller , Fennemore Craig, Douglas C. Northup , Fennemore Craig PC, pro hac vice & Karl L. Nielson , Smith Larsen & Wixom.

Treasure Franchise Company, LLC, Defendant, represented by Christopher H. Byrd , Fennemore Craig Jones Vargas, Courtney R. Beller , Fennemore Craig, Douglas C. Northup , Fennemore Craig PC, pro hac vice & Karl L. Nielson , Smith Larsen & Wixom.


ORDER

This matter is before the court on defendants' Application for Attorney's Fees and Costs (ECF No. 63). The court has considered the application, Supporting Memorandum (ECF No. 64), plaintiff's response (ECF No. 68), defendant's Reply (ECF No. 71) and the arguments of counsel at the hearing held January...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases