1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 259 F.Supp.3d
  5. 259 F.Supp.3d 816 (2017)
 

DYSON, INC. v. SHARKNINJA OPERATING LLC

Case No. 14 C 9442.

259 F.Supp.3d 816 (2017)

DYSON, INC., Plaintiff, v. SHARKNINJA OPERATING LLC and Sharkninja Sales Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

Signed April 26, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Nature of Suit: 840 Trademark
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robin Ann McCue , Brian A. Verbus , Ian J. Block , Megan Margaret New , Susan Louise Tanaka , Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Chicago, IL, Gregg F. Locascio , Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

David L. Witcoff , Jones Day, Paul E. Veith , Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL, Caroline Petro Gately , Christopher Scott Crook , Roger A. Colaizzi , Venable LLP, John G. Froemming , Jones Day, Washington, DC, Kevin William Weigand , Nicholas Martin Depalma , Randall K. Miller , Taylor S. Chapman , Venable LLP, Tysons Corner, VA, Robert Edward Bugg , Venable LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

The Lanham Act does not protect sellers from competition from better or cheaper products, but it does protect sellers "from having their customers lured away from them by deceptive ads." Schering-Plough Healthcare Prod., Inc. v. Schwarz...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases