1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. FROST v. LG ELECTRONICS INC.
 

FROST v. LG ELECTRONICS INC.

Case No. 16-cv-05206-BLF.

A. FROST, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. LG ELECTRONICS INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

April 21, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Nature of Suit: 410 Anti - Trust
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. Frost, Plaintiff, represented by Brittany N. Resch , Gustafson Gluek PLLC, pro hac vice.

A. Frost, Plaintiff, represented by Catherine Sung-Yun K. Smith , Gustafson Gluek PLLC, pro hac vice, Daniel E. Gustafson , Gustafson Gluek PLLC, pro hac vice, Eric L. Cramer , Berger & Montague, P.C., pro hac vice, Kenneth A. Wexler , Wexler Wallace LLP, pro hac vice, Kyla Jenny Gibboney , Joseph Saveri Law Firm, Matthew Sinclair Weiler , Joseph Saveri Law Firm, Inc., Michael Jay Kane , Berger Montague PC, pro hac vice, Rachel Nicole Rivers , Gross & Klein LLP, Stuart George Gross , Gross & Klein, LLP, Vincent J. Esades , Heins Mills & Olson, P.L.C., pro hac vice & Joseph R. Saveri , Joseph Saveri Law Firm, Inc..

Jose Ra, Plaintiff, represented by Adam John Zapala , Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP, Steven Noel Williams , Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP & Elizabeth Tran , Cotchett, Pitre and McCarthy.

Andrew Amironovin, Plaintiff, represented by Jason Michael Lindner , Stueve Siegel Hanson, LLP & Jason Scott Hartley , Stueve Siegel Hanson, LLP.

LG Electronics Inc., Defendant, represented by John Harrison L'Estrange, Jr. , Wright, L'Estrange, Nathan P. Eimer , Eimer Stahl LLP, pro hac vice, Andrew Edward Schouten , Wright LEstrange Ergastolo, Daniel David Birk , Eimer Stahl LLP, pro hac vice, James William Joseph , Eimer Stahl LLP, pro hac vice, James Kylstra , Eimer Stahl LLP, pro hac vice & Joseph Thomas Ergastolo , Wright, LEstrange Ergastolo.

LG Electronics USA, Inc., Defendant, represented by John Harrison L'Estrange, Jr. , Wright, L'Estrange, Nathan P. Eimer , Eimer Stahl LLP, pro hac vice, Andrew Edward Schouten , Wright LEstrange Ergastolo, Daniel David Birk , Eimer Stahl LLP, pro hac vice, James William Joseph , Eimer Stahl LLP, pro hac vice, James Kylstra , Eimer Stahl LLP, pro hac vice & Joseph Thomas Ergastolo , Wright, LEstrange Ergastolo.

LG Display Co., Ltd, Defendant, represented by John Harrison L'Estrange, Jr. , Wright, L'Estrange, Nathan P. Eimer , Eimer Stahl LLP, pro hac vice, Andrew Edward Schouten , Wright LEstrange Ergastolo, Daniel David Birk , Eimer Stahl LLP, pro hac vice, James William Joseph , Eimer Stahl LLP, pro hac vice, James Kylstra , Eimer Stahl LLP, pro hac vice & Joseph Thomas Ergastolo , Wright, LEstrange Ergastolo.

LG Display America, Inc., Defendant, represented by John Harrison L'Estrange, Jr. , Wright, L'Estrange, Nathan P. Eimer , Eimer Stahl LLP, pro hac vice, Andrew Edward Schouten , Wright LEstrange Ergastolo, Daniel David Birk , Eimer Stahl LLP, pro hac vice, James William Joseph , Eimer Stahl LLP, pro hac vice, James Kylstra , Eimer Stahl LLP, pro hac vice & Joseph Thomas Ergastolo , Wright, LEstrange Ergastolo.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, Defendant, represented by Anne Davis , Arnold and Porter LLP, pro hac vice, Carolyn Ann Pearce , Arnold and Porter LLP, James L. Cooper , Arnold and Porter, pro hac vice & Kenneth Lee Chernof , Arnold Porter LLP.

Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Defendant, represented by Anne Davis , Arnold and Porter LLP, pro hac vice, Carolyn Ann Pearce , Arnold and Porter LLP, Daniel B. Asimow , Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, James L. Cooper , Arnold and Porter, pro hac vice & Kenneth Lee Chernof , Arnold Porter LLP.

Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Defendant, represented by Anne Davis , Arnold and Porter LLP, pro hac vice, Carolyn Ann Pearce , Arnold and Porter LLP, Daniel B. Asimow , Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, James L. Cooper , Arnold and Porter, pro hac vice & Kenneth Lee Chernof , Arnold Porter LLP.

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

Defendants' motions to dismiss Plaintiffs' consolidated class action complaint ("Compl.") were heard on April 20, 2017. ECF 61, 62. The Court has considered the parties' briefing and oral argument presented at the hearing. For the reasons stated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases