1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNIVERSAL REHAB SERVICES, INC.
 

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNIVERSAL REHAB SERVICES, INC.

Case No. 2:15-cv-10993.

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSAL REHAB SERVICES, INC., PHYSIOFLEX, P.L.L.C., SUMMIT MEDICAL GROUP, P.L.L.C., DAVID JANKOWSKI, D.O., and AHMAD T. ABULABON, P.T., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan.

March 30, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Cause: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Nature of Suit: 470 Racketeer / Corrupt Organization
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew D. Welker , Katten Muchin & Rosenman LLP.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Plaintiff, represented by David D. O'Brien , Miller, Canfield, Jeffrey Alan Crapko , Miller Canfield, Kathy P. Josephson , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Theodore R. Eppel , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Thomas W. Cranmer , Miller Canfield Paddock and Stone PLC & Ross O. Silverman , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP.

Pacific Marketing and Advertising,Inc., Petitioner, represented by Justin Haas , Haas & Goldstein, P.C..

Universal Rehab Services, Inc., Defendant, represented by Marla A. Linderman , Linderman Law PLLC & Peter W. Joelson , Joelson, Rosenberg.

PhysioFlex, PLLC, Defendant, represented by Marla A. Linderman , Linderman Law PLLC & Peter W. Joelson , Joelson, Rosenberg.

Summit Medical Group, PLLC, Defendant, represented by David W. Warren , Joelson, Rosenberg, Emily R. Warren , Joelson Rosenberg, PLC, Gary R. Blumberg & Peter W. Joelson , Joelson, Rosenberg.

David Jankowski, D.O., Defendant, represented by David W. Warren , Joelson, Rosenberg, Emily R. Warren , Joelson Rosenberg, PLC, Gary R. Blumberg & Peter W. Joelson , Joelson, Rosenberg.

Ahmad T Abulabon, P.T., Defendant, represented by Marla A. Linderman , Linderman Law PLLC & Peter W. Joelson , Joelson, Rosenberg.

Applebaum & Stone, PLC, Respondent, represented by Ben M. Gonek , Law Offices of Ben M. Gonek, PLLC.

Weiner & Associates, PLLC, Respondent, represented by Ben M. Gonek , Law Offices of Ben M. Gonek, PLLC.

Cy Weiner, Respondent, represented by Ben M. Gonek , Law Offices of Ben M. Gonek, PLLC.

Varjabedian Attorneys, PC, Respondent, represented by Ben M. Gonek , Law Offices of Ben M. Gonek, PLLC.

Pacific Marketing, Inc, Movant, represented by Richard G. Finch , Michigan Accident Associates.

Garden State Media, Inc., Movant, represented by Richard G. Finch , Michigan Accident Associates.

Mike Mashhour, Interested Party, represented by Hamid M. Soueidan, II , Varnum LLP.

Summit Medical Group, PLLC, Counter Claimant, represented by David W. Warren , Joelson, Rosenberg, Emily R. Warren , Joelson Rosenberg, PLC, Gary R. Blumberg & Peter W. Joelson , Joelson, Rosenberg.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Counter Defendant, represented by Andrew D. Welker , Katten Muchin & Rosenman LLP, David D. O'Brien , Miller, Canfield, Jeffrey Alan Crapko , Miller Canfield, Kathy P. Josephson , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Thomas W. Cranmer , Miller Canfield Paddock and Stone PLC & Ross O. Silverman , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP.

Ahmad T Abulabon, P.T., Counter Claimant, represented by Marla A. Linderman , Linderman Law PLLC.

PhysioFlex, PLLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Marla A. Linderman , Linderman Law PLLC.

Universal Rehab Services, Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Marla A. Linderman , Linderman Law PLLC.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Counter Defendant, represented by Andrew D. Welker , Katten Muchin & Rosenman LLP, David D. O'Brien , Miller, Canfield, Jeffrey Alan Crapko , Miller Canfield, Kathy P. Josephson , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Theodore R. Eppel , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Thomas W. Cranmer , Miller Canfield Paddock and Stone PLC & Ross O. Silverman , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF STATE FARM MUTUAL'S MOTION (DE 123) TO DISMISS THE UNIVERSAL DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIMS (DE 116)

I. RECOMMENDATION:

For the reasons that follow, it is RECOMMENDED that the Court GRANT IN PART and DENY IN PART...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases