SMART WEARABLE TECHNOLOGIES INC. v. FITBIT, INC.

Civil Action No. 3:16CV00077.

274 F.Supp.3d 371 (2017)

SMART WEARABLE TECHNOLOGIES INC., Plaintiff, v. FITBIT, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Charlottesville Division.

Signed April 6, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Corby Robert Vowell , Pro Hac Vice, Jonathan T. Suder , Pro Hac Vice, Richard Allen Wojcio, Jr. , Pro Hac Vice, Friedman, Suder & Cooke, Fort Worth, TX, Justin Manning Wolcott , Mark D. Obenshain , Obenshain Law Group, Harrisonburg, VA, for Plaintiff.

Clement Seth Roberts , Pro Hac Vice, Eugene Novikov , Pro Hac Vice, James S. Tsuei , Pro Hac Vice, Timothy C. Saulsbury , Pro Hac Vice, Durie Tangri LLP, San Francsico, CA, Robert Charles Van Arnam , Pro Hac Vice, Raleigh, NC, Joseph Earl Blackburn, III , Patrick Risdon Hanes , Richmond, VA, for Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Smart Wearable Technologies Inc. ("Smart Wearable") filed this action against Fitbit, Inc. ("Fitbit") for alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,997,882 B1 ("the '882 Patent"). Smart Wearable asserts claims of direct and indirect infringement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases