1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 248 F.Supp.3d
  5. 248 F.Supp.3d 1040 (2017)
 

CROCS, INC. v. EFFERVESCENT, INC.

Civil Action No. 06-cv-00605-PAB-KMT. (Consolidated with Civil Action No. 16-cv-02004-PAB-KMT.)

248 F.Supp.3d 1040 (2017)

CROCS, INC., Plaintiff, v. EFFERVESCENT, INC., Holey Soles Holdings, Ltd., Double Diamond Distribution, Ltd., and U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc., Defendants. U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc. and Double Diamond Distribution, Ltd., Plaintiffs, v. Ronald Snyder, Daniel Hart, Thomas J. Smach, Andrew Rees, Gregg Ribatt, Andrew Reddyhoff, George B. Boedecker, Jr., Lyndon Hanson, Donald Lococo, Raymond Croghan, Ronald Frasch, Michael Margolis, Jeffrey Lasher, Michael E. Marks, Prakash Melwani, John P. McCarvel, Erik Rebich, Sara Hoverstock, and John and Jane Doe Defendants 1-30, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Colorado.

Signed March 31, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Natalie Marie Hanlon-Leh , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, LLP, Jared Barrett Briant , Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Paul Wayne Rodney , Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP Denver, CO, Julie Kent , Lara Palanjian , Michael Anthony Berta , Sean Michael Callagy , Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff/Defendants.

Michael G. Martin , Michael Martin Law, Alexander Christian Clayden , Stephen J. Horace , Lathrop & Gage, LLP, Dan Cleveland, Jr. , Fennemore Craig, P.C., Denver, CO, Mitchell Craig Shapiro , MC Shapiro Law PC, Great Neck, NY, Brian John Elliott , Brian J. Elliott , Attorney at Law, Austin, TX, Christopher W. Hellmich , Hellmich Law Group P.C., Anaheim Hills, CA, David Joseph Kaplan , Jeffery Kyle McClain , USA Dawgs, Inc., Las Vegas, NV, for Defendants/Plaintiffs.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Crocs, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims V-XII [Docket No. 227] and Scott Seamans' Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims VI-IX [Docket No. 231]. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.

I. BACKGROUND

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases