1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MARTINEZ v. CITY OF CHICAGO
 

MARTINEZ v. CITY OF CHICAGO

Case No. 14-cv-369.

DANIEL MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

March 30, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Martinez, Plaintiff, represented by Jared Samuel Kosoglad , Jared S. Kosoglad P.C..

Daniel Martinez, Plaintiff, represented by Jeanette Samuels , Samuels & Associates, Ltd., Jon F. Erickson , Erickson & Oppenheimer, Ltd., Michael D. Oppenheimer , Erickson & Oppenheimer, Ltd., Ronak P. Maisuria , Erickson & Oppenheimer, Ltd. & Torreya Lyn Hamilton , Hamilton Law Office, LLC.

City Of Chicago, Defendant, represented by Eric S. Palles , Ravitz & Palles, Lawrence S. Kowalczyk , Querrey & Harrow, Ltd., Brian Franklin Kolp , Office of the Illinois Attorney General & Megan Kathleen Monaghan , Querrey & Harrow, Ltd..

Jeffrey Weber, Defendant, represented by Eric S. Palles , Ravitz & Palles, Lawrence S. Kowalczyk , Querrey & Harrow, Ltd., Tiffany Yvette Harris , City of Chicago Law Department, Brian Franklin Kolp , Office of the Illinois Attorney General & Megan Kathleen Monaghan , Querrey & Harrow, Ltd..

Allyson Bogdalek, Defendant, represented by Eric S. Palles , Ravitz & Palles, Gary Jay Ravitz , Ravitz & Palles, P.C. & Emily Wessel Farr , Ardent Law, Llc.

Juan Chavez, Defendant, represented by Eric S. Palles , Ravitz & Palles, Lawrence S. Kowalczyk , Querrey & Harrow, Ltd., Tiffany Yvette Harris , City of Chicago Law Department, Brian Franklin Kolp , Office of the Illinois Attorney General & Megan Kathleen Monaghan , Querrey & Harrow, Ltd..

Cook County State's Attorney's Office, Respondent, represented by Mary Anne V. Spillane , Spillane Law, LLC & Thomas Edward Nowinski , Cook County State's Attorneys Office.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Before the Court are Plaintiff Daniel Martinez's motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b) and for a new trial pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59 [259] and Defendants' bill of costs [260].1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases