1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. PHILIPS v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
 

PHILIPS v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY

Case No. 14-CV-02989-LHK.

WILLIAM PHILIPS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

February 16, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson - Moss Warranty Act
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Philips, Plaintiff, represented by Adam J. Levitt , Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., pro hac vice.

William Philips, Plaintiff, represented by David Brian Fernandes , Baron & Budd, P.C., John Ernst Tangren , Grant and Eisenhofer P.A., pro hac vice, Mary Sikra Thomas , Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A., Nathan Bowen Atkinson , Spilman Thomas and Battle, PLLC, Niall A. Paul , Spilman Thomas and Battle, PLLC, Mark Philip Pifko , Baron & Budd, P.C. & Roland K. Tellis , Baron Budd, P.C..

Jason Wilkinson, Plaintiff, represented by Adam J. Levitt , Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., pro hac vice, John Ernst Tangren , Grant and Eisenhofer P.A., pro hac vice, Mary Sikra Thomas , Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A., Nathan Bowen Atkinson , Spilman Thomas and Battle, PLLC, Niall A. Paul , Spilman Thomas and Battle, PLLC, Mark Philip Pifko , Baron & Budd, P.C. & Roland K. Tellis , Baron Budd, P.C..

Alison Colburn, Plaintiff, represented by Adam J. Levitt , Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., David Brian Fernandes , Baron & Budd, P.C., Mary Sikra Thomas , Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A., Nathan Bowen Atkinson , Spilman Thomas and Battle, PLLC & Mark Philip Pifko , Baron & Budd, P.C..

Jaime Goodman, Plaintiff, represented by Adam J. Levitt , Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., David Brian Fernandes , Baron & Budd, P.C., Mary Sikra Thomas , Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A., Nathan Bowen Atkinson , Spilman Thomas and Battle, PLLC & Mark Philip Pifko , Baron & Budd, P.C..

Robert Morris, Plaintiff, represented by Adam J. Levitt , Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., pro hac vice, John Ernst Tangren , Grant and Eisenhofer P.A., pro hac vice, Mary Sikra Thomas , Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A., Nathan Bowen Atkinson , Spilman Thomas and Battle, PLLC, Mark Philip Pifko , Baron & Budd, P.C. & Roland K. Tellis , Baron Budd, P.C..

Victoria Jackson, Plaintiff, represented by Adam J. Levitt , Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., pro hac vice, Mary Sikra Thomas , Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A., Nathan Bowen Atkinson , Spilman Thomas and Battle, PLLC, Niall A. Paul , Spilman Thomas and Battle, PLLC, Mark Philip Pifko , Baron & Budd, P.C. & Roland K. Tellis , Baron Budd, P.C..

JohnPaul Fournier, Plaintiff, represented by Adam J. Levitt , Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., pro hac vice, John Ernst Tangren , Grant and Eisenhofer P.A., pro hac vice, Mary Sikra Thomas , Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A., Nathan Bowen Atkinson , Spilman Thomas and Battle, PLLC, Niall A. Paul , Spilman Thomas and Battle, PLLC, Mark Philip Pifko , Baron & Budd, P.C. & Roland K. Tellis , Baron Budd, P.C..

Ryan Wolf, Plaintiff, represented by Adam J. Levitt , Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., pro hac vice, John Ernst Tangren , Grant and Eisenhofer P.A., pro hac vice, Mary Sikra Thomas , Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A., Nathan Bowen Atkinson , Spilman Thomas and Battle, PLLC, Niall A. Paul , Spilman Thomas and Battle, PLLC, Mark Philip Pifko , Baron & Budd, P.C. & Roland K. Tellis , Baron Budd, P.C..

Rebecca Wolf, Plaintiff, represented by Adam J. Levitt , Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., pro hac vice, Mary Sikra Thomas , Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A., Nathan Bowen Atkinson , Spilman Thomas and Battle, PLLC, Niall A. Paul , Spilman Thomas and Battle, PLLC, Mark Philip Pifko , Baron & Budd, P.C. & Roland K. Tellis , Baron Budd, P.C..

Ford Motor Company, Defendant, represented by Amir M. Nassihi , Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., Andrew D. Carpenter , Shook, Hardy and Bacon L.L.P., pro hac vice, Andrew L. Chang , Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., Christopher Scott McRae , Shook, Hardy and Bacon L.L.P., pro hac vice, Dustin Alan Lane , Bowman and Brooke LLP, Michael Kevin Underhill , Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP & Todd Andrew Croftchik , Bowman and Brooke LLP, pro hac vice.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Re: Dkt. No. 238

Before the Court is the parties' Joint Administrative Motion to Seal Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant Ford Motor Company's Motion for Summary Judgment and to Correct Redactions Contained in the Opposition and Certain Exhibits to that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases