1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. PEREZ v. TLC RESIDENTIAL INC.
 

PEREZ v. TLC RESIDENTIAL INC.

No. C 15-02776 WHA.

THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff, v. TLC RESIDENTIAL INC. and FRANCISCO MONTERO, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

February 6, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nature of Suit: 710 Labor: Fair Standards
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas E. Perez, Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin Richard Botts , Office of the Solicitor.

Thomas E. Perez, Plaintiff, represented by Katherine Mace Kasameyer , United States Department of Labor.

TLC Residential Inc, Defendant, represented by N. Rebecca A. Turner , Fog City Law Group & Cynthia Browning , Fog City Law Group.

Francisco Montero, Defendant, represented by N. Rebecca A. Turner , Fog City Law Group & Cynthia Browning , Fog City Law Group.

Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley, Objector, represented by Nicole Suzanne Healy , Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley & Todd Andrew Roberts , Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley.

Nicole Healy, Objector, represented by Nicole Suzanne Healy , Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley & Todd Andrew Roberts , Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley.

Todd Roberts, Objector, represented by Nicole Suzanne Healy , Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley & Todd Andrew Roberts , Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley.

Francisco Montero, Counter-claimant, represented by N. Rebecca A. Turner , Fog City Law Group & Cynthia Browning , Fog City Law Group.

TLC Residential Inc, Counter-claimant, represented by N. Rebecca A. Turner , Fog City Law Group & Cynthia Browning , Fog City Law Group.

Thomas E. Perez, Counter-defendant, Pro se, N. Rebecca A. Turner , Fog City Law Group & Cynthia Browning , Fog City Law Group.

Francisco Montero, Counter-claimant, represented by N. Rebecca A. Turner , Fog City Law Group & Cynthia Browning , Fog City Law Group.

Thomas E. Perez, Counter-defendant, Pro Se.

ORDER SETTING HEARING ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE

The Court has reviewed the Secretary's discovery letter (styled as a motion to compel) regarding defendants' responses to discovery (Dkt. Nos. 146-47). Defendants' response, which shall not exceed THREE PAGES in length, is due by FEBRUARY 13 AT...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases