INTEL CORPORATION v. FUTURE LINK SYSTEMS, LLC

C.A. No. 14-377-LPS.

INTEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. FUTURE LINK SYSTEMS, LLC, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

January 27, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Intel Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Jack B. Blumenfeld , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP.

Intel Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Maryellen Noreika , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP.

Future Link Systems LLC, Defendant, represented by Brian E. Farnan , Farnan LLP, Amy Proctor , pro hac vice, Benjamin W. Hattenbach , pro hac vice, Dominik Slusarczyk , pro hac vice, Ellisen S. Turner , pro hac vice, Michael J. Farnan , Farnan LLP, Molly Russell , pro hac vice & Richard W. Krebs , pro hac vice.

Future Link Systems LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Brian E. Farnan , Farnan LLP, Benjamin W. Hattenbach , Dominik Slusarczyk , Ellisen S. Turner , Michael J. Farnan , Farnan LLP & Richard W. Krebs .

Intel Corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by Jack B. Blumenfeld , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP & Maryellen Noreika , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP.

Intel Corporation, Counter Claimant, represented by Jack B. Blumenfeld , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP & Maryellen Noreika , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP.

Future Link Systems LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by Brian E. Farnan , Farnan LLP, Benjamin W. Hattenbach , Dominik Slusarczyk , Ellisen S. Turner , Michael J. Farnan , Farnan LLP & Richard W. Krebs .

Intel Corporation, Counter Claimant, represented by Jack B. Blumenfeld , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP & Maryellen Noreika , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP.

Intel Corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by Jack B. Blumenfeld , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP & Maryellen Noreika , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

At Wilmington this 27th day of January, 2017:

Pending before the Court are disputes related to the parties' privilege logs. (See D.I. 436) On August 17, 2016, the Court held a teleconference to hear argument on the parties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases