1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MARIANO v. VILLA
 

MARIANO v. VILLA

Case No. 5:16-cv-03467-EJD.

CIRINA JUSTO MARIANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ENRIQUE VALENCIA VILLA, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

January 19, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cirina Justo Mariano, Plaintiff, represented by Jon Michaelson , Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP.

Cirina Justo Mariano, Plaintiff, represented by Ko-Fang Chang , Kilpatrick Townsend and Stockton LLP, Kyra Ann Kazantzis , Law Foundation of Silicon Valley, Maighna Jain , Law Foundation of Silicon Valley, Matthew Frederick Warren , Law Foundation of Silicon Valley, Nadia Aziz , Fair Housing Law Project Law Foundation of Silicon Valley & Thomas Philip Zito , Law Foundation of Silicon Valley.

A C G, Plaintiff, represented by Jon Michaelson , Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Ko-Fang Chang , Kilpatrick Townsend and Stockton LLP, Kyra Ann Kazantzis , Law Foundation of Silicon Valley, Maighna Jain , Law Foundation of Silicon Valley, Matthew Frederick Warren , Law Foundation of Silicon Valley, Nadia Aziz , Fair Housing Law Project Law Foundation of Silicon Valley & Thomas Philip Zito , Law Foundation of Silicon Valley.

A D G, Plaintiff, represented by Jon Michaelson , Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Ko-Fang Chang , Kilpatrick Townsend and Stockton LLP, Kyra Ann Kazantzis , Law Foundation of Silicon Valley, Maighna Jain , Law Foundation of Silicon Valley, Matthew Frederick Warren , Law Foundation of Silicon Valley, Nadia Aziz , Fair Housing Law Project Law Foundation of Silicon Valley & Thomas Philip Zito , Law Foundation of Silicon Valley.

Arturo Villa, Defendant, represented by David Samuel Henshaw , Henshaw Law Office.

Rigoberto Villa, Defendant, represented by David Samuel Henshaw , Henshaw Law Office.

PRETRIAL ORDER (JURY)

The above-entitled action is scheduled for a Trial Setting Conference on January 26, 2017. Based on the parties' Joint Trial Setting Conference Statement, the court has determined an appearance is unnecessary at this time. Accordingly, the Trial Setting Conference is VACATED and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases