1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. GRAIN DEALERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. COOLEY
 

GRAIN DEALERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. COOLEY

Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-39-KS-MTP.

GRAIN DEALERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. TAMMY COOLEY, ET AL., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Eastern Division.

January 6, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Insurance Contract
Nature of Suit: 110 Insurance
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Company, Plaintiff, represented by Lynn Etheridge Hare , HARE & CLEMENT, PC.

Tammy Cooley, Defendant, represented by Brian Craig Kimball , BUTLER SNOW LLP, Haley Fowler Gregory , BUTLER SNOW LLP & John Alexander Brunini , BUTLER SNOW LLP.

Walter Cooley, Defendant, represented by Brian Craig Kimball , BUTLER SNOW LLP, Haley Fowler Gregory , BUTLER SNOW LLP & John Alexander Brunini , BUTLER SNOW LLP.

Sunrise Trading Post, LLC, Defendant, represented by Brian Craig Kimball , BUTLER SNOW LLP, Haley Fowler Gregory , BUTLER SNOW LLP & John Alexander Brunini , BUTLER SNOW LLP.

Pine Belt Oil Company, Inc., Defendant, represented by James K. Dukes , LAW OFFICE OF JAMES K. DUKES, Joseph Henry Hart, IV , KUCHLER, POLK, SCHELL, WEINER & RICHESON, LLC & Monique M. Weiner , KUCHLER, POLK, SCHELL, WEINER & RICHESON, LLC, pro hac vice.

Walter Cooley, Counter Claimant, represented by Brian Craig Kimball , BUTLER SNOW LLP, Haley Fowler Gregory , BUTLER SNOW LLP & John Alexander Brunini , BUTLER SNOW LLP.

Tammy Cooley, Counter Claimant, represented by Brian Craig Kimball , BUTLER SNOW LLP, Haley Fowler Gregory , BUTLER SNOW LLP & John Alexander Brunini , BUTLER SNOW LLP.

Sunrise Trading Post, LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Brian Craig Kimball , BUTLER SNOW LLP, Haley Fowler Gregory , BUTLER SNOW LLP & John Alexander Brunini , BUTLER SNOW LLP.

Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Company, Counter Defendant, represented by Lynn Etheridge Hare , HARE & CLEMENT, PC.

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Amend Scheduling Order [38], Defendants' Motion to Compel [43], and Plaintiff's Motion to Strike [51]. Having considered the parties' submissions, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that Defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases