1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CAMERON MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. v. JOHNSON
 

CAMERON MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. v. JOHNSON

Case No. 4:15-cv-4081.

CAMERON MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff, v. STEVEN JOHNSON, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Texarkana Division.

December 30, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Declaratory Judgement
Nature of Suit: 110 Insurance
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cameron Mutual Insurance Company, Plaintiff, represented by Scott Michael Strauss , Barber Law Firm PLLC.

Steven Johnson, Defendant, Pro Se.

Vanessa Griffin, Defendant, represented by Charles Daniel Hancock , Hancock Law Firm & Jonathan T. Lane , The Lane Firm.

Marcus Griffin, Defendant, represented by Charles Daniel Hancock , Hancock Law Firm & Jonathan T. Lane , The Lane Firm.

Brooklynn Howard, Defendant, represented by Charles Daniel Hancock , Hancock Law Firm & Jonathan T. Lane , The Lane Firm.

Alsandria Reid, Defendant, represented by Charles Daniel Hancock , Hancock Law Firm & Jonathan T. Lane , The Lane Firm.

Alphonso Reid, Defendant, represented by Charles Daniel Hancock , Hancock Law Firm & Jonathan T. Lane , The Lane Firm.

Angela Ondrisek, Defendant, represented by Charles Daniel Hancock , Hancock Law Firm & Jonathan T. Lane , The Lane Firm.

Nicholas Broderick, Defendant, represented by Charles Daniel Hancock , Hancock Law Firm & Jonathan T. Lane , The Lane Firm.

Matthew Broderick, Defendant, represented by Charles Daniel Hancock , Hancock Law Firm & Jonathan T. Lane , The Lane Firm.

Marissa Broderick, Defendant, represented by Charles Daniel Hancock , Hancock Law Firm & Jonathan T. Lane , The Lane Firm.

Shaina Broderick, Defendant, represented by Charles Daniel Hancock , Hancock Law Firm & Jonathan T. Lane , The Lane Firm.

Nathan Griffin, Defendant, represented by Charles Daniel Hancock , Hancock Law Firm & Jonathan T. Lane , The Lane Firm.

Alexis Broderick, Defendant, represented by Charles Daniel Hancock , Hancock Law Firm & Jonathan T. Lane , The Lane Firm.

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 30). Plaintiff has responded. (ECF No. 33). The Court finds this matter ripe for consideration.

In April 2014, Defendants filed suit in this Court against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases