SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. DROPBOX INC.

Case No. 16-cv-00119-HSG.

226 F.Supp.3d 1000 (2016)

SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. DROPBOX INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Signed December 22, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joel Nathan Bock , Andrew Marc Grodin , Dentons U.S. LLP, Joel N. Bock , SNR Denton U.S. LLP, Short Hills, NJ, Shailendra K. Maheshwari , SNR Denton U.S. LLP, Mark Lee Hogge , Nicholas Hunt Jackson , Dentons U.S. LLP, Washington, DC, Sarah S. Eskandari , Dentons U.S. LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff.

Adam D. Harber , Christopher John Mandernach , David M. Krinsky , Thomas H.L. Selby , Williams and Connolly, LLP, Washington, DC, Jonathan Alan Patchen , Stephen E. Taylor , Taylor & Patchen, LLP, Sonali Deeksha Maitra , Durie Tangri LLP, San Francisco, CA, Robert M. Goodman , Thomas Kiley Murphy, III , Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis, LLP, Roseland, NJ, for Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

I. INTRODUCTION

Pending before the Court is Defendant Dropbox, Inc.'s motion to dismiss. Defendant argues that United States Patent Nos. 6,671,757 ("the '757 Patent"), 7,587,446 ("the '446 Patent") and 6,757,696 ("the '696 Patent") are invalid...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases