1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. BENTLEY v. HIGHLANDS HOSPITAL CORPORATION
 

BENTLEY v. HIGHLANDS HOSPITAL CORPORATION

Civil No. 15-97-ART.

ROBYN BENTLEY, Plaintiff, v. HIGHLANDS HOSPITAL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Southern Division, Pikeville.

December 13, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robyn Bentley, Plaintiff, represented by Charles Allen Foster , Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLP, pro hac vice.

Robyn Bentley, Plaintiff, represented by Erik D. Bolog , Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLP, pro hac vice, Lesley Cayton , Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLP, Patrick T. Gaffney , pro hac vice & Sandra Spurgeon , Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLP.

Highlands Hospital Corporation, Defendant, represented by Timothy H. Napier , Napier Gault Schupback & Stevens, PLC & Victoria E. Boggs , Napier Gault Schupback & Stevens, PLC.

Consolidated Health Systems, Inc., Defendant, represented by Timothy H. Napier , Napier Gault Schupback & Stevens, PLC & Victoria E. Boggs , Napier Gault Schupback & Stevens, PLC.

Terry D. Hall, Defendant, represented by Geoffrey D. Marsh , Williams, Hall & Latherow, LLP & Kenneth Williams, Jr. , Williams, Hall & Latherow, LLP.

Paintsville Hospital Company, LLC, Defendant, represented by Calvin R. Fulkerson , Fulkerson Kinkel Marrs, PLLC, David A. Trevey , Fulkerson Kinkel Marrs, PLLC & Kyle Matthew Virgin , Fulkerson Kinkel Marrs, PLLC.

Thomas B. Styer, Defendant, represented by John W. Phillips , Phillips Parker Orberson & Arnett PLC & Katherine Tipton Watts , Phillips Parker Orberson & Arnett PLC.

Whitaker National Corporation, Defendant, represented by John W. Phillips , Phillips Parker Orberson & Arnett PLC & Katherine Tipton Watts , Phillips Parker Orberson & Arnett PLC.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

In baseball, ties go to the runner. In summary judgment, ties go to the plaintiff. Why? Because civil litigants have a right to a jury trial. See U.S. Const. amend. VII. And when a case comes down to a close call, the jury must be the one to make it. See Kennedy v....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases