1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SEBERT v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
 

SEBERT v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

No. CV-16-00354-PHX-ROS (ESW).

Seth W Sebert, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Arizona Department of Corrections, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

November 15, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 550 Prisoner: Civil Rights
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Asia Lynn Sebert, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Arizona Department of Corrections, Defendant, represented by Lisa Marie Hemann , Office of the Attorney General & Neil Singh , Office of the Attorney General.

Corizon Health Incorporated, Defendant, represented by Joseph Scott Conlon , Renaud Cook Drury Mesaros PA.

Corizon Incorporated, Defendant, represented by Joseph Scott Conlon , Renaud Cook Drury Mesaros PA.

Corizon LLC, Defendant, represented by Joseph Scott Conlon , Renaud Cook Drury Mesaros PA.

Corizon Health of New Jersey LLC, Defendant, represented by Joseph Scott Conlon , Renaud Cook Drury Mesaros PA.

Caron Grant, Defendant, represented by Brandi Christine Blair , Jones Skelton & Hochuli PLC & Jonah Eric Rappazzo , Jones Skelton & Hochuli PLC.

Anthony M Villavicencio, Defendant, represented by Barry Matthew Markson , Thomas Markson Rubin & Kelley PC.

State of Arizona, Defendant, represented by Neil Singh , Office of the Attorney General.

Charles L Ryan, Defendant, represented by Neil Singh , Office of the Attorney General.

Christopher Moody, Defendant, represented by Neil Singh , Office of the Attorney General.

James O'Neil, Defendant, represented by Neil Singh , Office of the Attorney General.

Wexford Health Sources Incorporated, Defendant, represented by Brandi Christine Blair , Jones Skelton & Hochuli PLC & Jonah Eric Rappazzo , Jones Skelton & Hochuli PLC.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pending before the Court is the Court's Order (Doc. 94) and Putative Defendants Moody and O'Neil's Motion to Quash Service (Doc. 95). The parties have responded to the Court's order to show cause, and Putative Defendants' Motion to Quash Service is fully briefed and deemed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases